Université de Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne - UJM vs Lesya Ukrainka East European National University vs Moscow State University of Printing Arts - MGUP vs Lutsk Polytechnic National University - NTU vs The Institute of Contemporary Music Performance - ICMP
Side-by-side comparison from 111 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Highly skilled and professional faculty.
- +Abundant opportunities for research and language practice.
- +Engaging extracurricular activities and events.
- +Engaging classes with practical application
- +Exceptional professors encouraging discussion and offering support
- +Rewarding academic challenges
Nothing to show
- +Practical industry-focused learning and skill development
- +Passionate and knowledgeable teaching staff
- +Useful facilities for musicians
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- +Excellent educational environment and dedicated faculty.
- +High-speed internet in residences is a welcome improvement.
- +Fosters personal growth and discipline despite academic pressure.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Outdated and inadequate facilities, with complaints about cleanliness and functionality.
- -Overpriced tuition relative to the quality of education and resources provided.
- -Administrative and management issues create an unwelcoming atmosphere.
- -Insufficient space and outdated facilities detract from the learning environment.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or poor quality.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Outdated academic environment, rules, and teaching approaches.
- -Ineffective instructors and mismatched syllabus for assessments.
- -Strict attendance policies coupled with monotonous and unengaging sessions.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in accommodations and value, both receiving perfect scores. Its facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are also highly regarded, each earning a 4-star rating. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which received a score of 0, indicating a significant drawback in this aspect.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in every evaluated aspect. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5. With such uniformly excellent feedback, identifying a weakest area is not possible; the university excels across the entire spectrum of student experience.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Location receives the highest commendation, followed closely by Facilities, Professors, and Internationality, all scoring very well. Student Life offers a solid experience. However, Accommodations represent a significant weakness, significantly impacting the overall perception. Value is rated moderately.
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
Student life and accommodation stand out as particularly strong aspects of this university, both scoring above 4.0. Professors and value for money also receive high marks, nearing the 4.0 threshold. Conversely, facilities and internationality are the lowest-rated areas, while location also shows room for improvement.
Nothing to show
All 5 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise skilled teachers and research opportunities, especially within the English and French Philology department. Minor points include improving heating and reducing photocopy costs.
With a 3/5 average rating, reviews highlight engaging classes and helpful professors (~33% positive). However, some negative feedback points to issues with budget allocation and library facilities (~33% negative).
Nothing to show
All three student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Recurring themes include strong learning experiences in music industry skills and passionate teachers.
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
Roughly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting educational facilities and a strong academic culture. A small percentage of negative feedback points to issues with residency facilities and some instructors' teaching approaches.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Entering this educational institution into the correspondence form of training with the use of distance educational technologies (DOT), I expected a lot of interesting lectures, seminars and skype conferences with teachers. However, the reality of me admitted a lot of surprise. Video-lectures turned out to be very small, Skype conferences were not in sight. Instead of exams and preparation for them, intermediate tests for 10-15-20-25 questions are used, which after the n-th passage begin to be repeated, the exam in total consists of 40-45 assignments.
Nothing to show
Everything is great. The teachers are passionate about teaching, and the facilities are very useful for musicians. The only thing is that I'm not sure if it was worth it to pay for the degree, in terms of value and career prospect.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show