Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology - JKUAT vs Daystar University vs The cooperative university of Kenya - CUK vs Murang'a University of Technology - mut vs Meru University of Science and Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 227 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong STEM, agriculture, and technology programmes
- +Supportive academic environment and practical learning
- +Positive student experience and sense of community
- +Student-centered approach and preparedness for disruptions
- +Engaging and practical academic programs with knowledgeable lecturers
- +Welcoming and supportive learning environment for personal growth
- +Strong, well-rounded programs with real-world relevance
- +Supportive faculty and enriching learning environment
- +Affordable fees and good student support
- +Dedicated, supportive lecturers
- +Conducive learning environment
- +Technological advancements and innovation
- +Modern, practical learning facilities and equipment
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable lecturers
- +Emphasis on academic excellence and student well-being
- +Passionate and knowledgeable professors
- +Extensive student support and resources
- +Engaging learning environment
- +Practical skills development for career readiness
- +Personal and talent growth opportunities
- -Lack of faculty support and guidance.
- -Repetitive or theoretical coursework.
- -Issues with program management and limited career prospects.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication with staff and instructors is frequently poor.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum design are disliked.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
This institution garners notable strengths in its **Location**, **Professors**, and **Value**, all receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category stands out as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Internationality is rated moderately well. Overall, the university presents a strong academic and environmental offering, with room for improvement in housing.
This institution receives high marks across most surveyed areas, with "Value" being the strongest at 4.51. "Facilities" also score exceptionally well at 4.46. "Internationality" and "Professors" are also rated favorably. The weakest area identified is "Accomodation," receiving a score of 3.9. "Student Life" and "Location" fall within a similarly mid-range, solid performance.
This institution garners a strong overall impression, with exceptional marks in **Location** (4.58) and **Student Life** (4.43), alongside a high rating for **Value** (4.47). Professors are also well-regarded (4.13). The weakest areas appear to be **Internationality** (3.4) and **Facilities** (3.71). Accommodations received a solid rating (3.93).
This institution receives strong marks across the board, with particularly high scores for Facilities and Professors, both at 4.5. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded, scoring 4.4 and 4.44 respectively. Internationality is rated at 4.3, while the Location stands out as the relatively weakest area, scoring 4.1. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with excellent academic and student experience components.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. The highest marks are for Value, closely followed by Facilities. Student Life and Accomodation also receive solid ratings. However, Internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, scoring considerably lower than other categories. The university's Location and Professors are rated well.
With perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top marks. There are no weak areas identified, indicating a consistently outstanding university experience and offering.
This university garners excellent scores for its location, achieving a perfect 5. Its facilities and professors also stand out with strong 4-star ratings, complemented by a solid 4.5 for value. Areas for development include student life and accommodation, both scoring a respectable 3 to 3.5 stars. Internationality also received a positive 4-star rating.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 based on 146 reviews, ~92% of students highlight strong academic programs and a supportive learning environment. A small minority (~2%) mentioned occasional administrative or faculty support challenges.
With an average rating of 4.46/5, ~97.6% of reviews are positive. Students praise student-centered approaches, prepared remote learning, engaging academics, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned institutional influences.
With 100% positive feedback, students highlight strong programs integrating theory and practice, knowledgeable faculty, and vibrant campus life. A few mention that resources could improve and eLearning isn't universally available.
Students consistently praise Murang'a University of Technology for its dedicated and supportive lecturers who facilitate timely syllabus completion. They also highlight the clean, safe, and vibrant campus environment with strong technological investment, contributing to quality education.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~92% rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Students praise academic excellence, practical preparation, modern facilities, and approachable lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight knowledgeable professors and a rich array of resources for success, including excellent library, labs, and strong support services.
With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight strong practical skill development and opportunities to foster personal talents. No negative comments were received.
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology is one of the best universities in Kenya, as a personal opinion and one that is recommended nationally. I went there first because it was a few kilometres away from home and I wanted the experience of living alone and generally to feel like an adult. It was home away from home, that I even stayed one year later even after graduation. The lecturers were quite tough which was a good thing because I almost didn't graduate because I had missed a few classes. All my practical units that required extra coursework outside class always had the lecturers in attendance even when they didn't have to. My lecturers were very friendly and very practical on what the course I did would translate to once I finished. The security was very good especially for a single female young lady miles away from home. There was plenty of room to study, from parks all around the university, the student centre and the library. You could also easily access help from the administration and get to the staff offices for extra help from our lectures without going through loops. I loved it there and yes, I would recommend it to a family or friend, depending on the course they plan to do. I was an introvert in campus but I remember trying things like rollball, table tennis, pool, drama which are available and active even till date.
Daystar University gtaught me the importance of expressing myself and respectfully disagreeing with opinions that i djid not subscribe to. The university taught me that as much as i am leader i should not be afraid to be hands on on any given task in life and work space. A servant leader leads by example and does not instill fear to those he is leading.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show