Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology - JKUAT vs KCA University vs Daystar University vs The Catholic University of Eastern Africa vs Laikipia University
Side-by-side comparison from 293 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Well-trained, professional lecturers and a good education system
- +Strong STEM, agriculture, business, and technology programs
- +Supportive environment for dedicated students
- +Practical and well-structured programs with supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
- +Quality education and career-oriented focus
- +Positive campus environment for collaboration and personal development
- +Engaging and practical academic programs with knowledgeable, supportive lecturers
- +Student-centered approach with responsive administration and flexible course options
- +Enriching student life through fun events, trips, and diverse learning environments
- +Supportive and intellectually stimulating environment
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +Relevant and tailored course material
- +Practical learning and quality education in key programs
- +Conducive, serene, and quiet learning environment
- +Welcoming and helpful staff
- +Diverse programs, mission-driven academics, and faculty expertise.
- +Ethical development and Christian values integration.
- +Culturally rich environment and international exposure.
- +Accessible faculty and personalized learning
- +Practical, hands-on education
- +Supportive and collaborative environment
- -Lack of faculty support and guidance.
- -Theoretical coursework with limited practical application.
- -Administrative issues, such as project supervisor allocation delays.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are not engaging or relevant.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Concerns about bias and institutional agendas impact academic integrity.
- -Lack of communication and support from lecturers.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Unsupportive or unavailable instructors negatively impact student experience.
Academic and social aspects of this university are highly regarded, with particular strengths noted in **Location** (4.46) and **Professors** (4.33). Student life and value for money also received impressive scores. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.69, though it remains a respectable rating.
This university excels in several key areas, with particularly high marks for Value (4.61), Professors (4.49), and Location (4.46). Student Life and Internationality also received strong scores, indicating a vibrant and diverse campus experience. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a considerably lower rating of 3.65.
Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance, with exceptional ratings in **Value** (4.52) and **Facilities** (4.48). **Internationality** (4.36) also received high marks. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, scoring 3.93. Other aspects like Professors, Location, and Student Life are rated favorably, generally above 4.2.
This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its location receiving the highest marks at 4.72. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.14, alongside professors at 4.09 and student life at 4.05. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, scoring 3.68, followed closely by facilities at 3.91.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings and overall value, with particularly high ratings for Professors (4.2) and Value (4). Conversely, the university faces challenges in its Accommodation (2.75) and Internationality (2.8) scores, indicating areas for potential improvement to enhance the student experience. Other aspects like Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately.
This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas, notably in facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors also earned a strong rating of 4.33. Location is the sole category with a slightly lower score, receiving a 4.
An overall strong performance is evident, with the university excelling in **Professors (5/5)** and **Facilities (4.5/5)**, and offering excellent **Value (4.5/5)**. Areas that appear less developed include **Location (3/5)** and **Student Life (3.5/5)**, which received moderate ratings. Internationality also scored well at 4/5.
With a 4.38 average rating from 148 reviews, ~98% of students are positive, citing strong academics, professional lecturers, and an enriching environment. A small minority of ~2% noted issues with faculty support and project supervision.
With ~93% positive reviews, students praise the university for its rewarding academic programs, well-structured curriculum, and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers. Practical learning and a collaborative campus environment are frequently highlighted.
A significant majority (~97.6%) of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging academics, supportive lecturers, and student-centered approaches. A single negative review mentioned potential influence from powerful groups.
The university receives largely positive reviews (~77%), with students highlighting a supportive academic environment, knowledgeable faculty, and good facilities. A small fraction (~5%) of feedback points to issues with communication, infrastructure, and strict rules.
With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise the quality education, practical learning, and dedicated faculty, especially in Agriculture, Education, and Business Studies. The serene learning environment and well-equipped facilities are also highlighted.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, reviews highlight strong program diversity, mission-driven academics, and a vibrant campus with international exposure. Students also appreciate the ethical and moral development offered, though one mentions the university is expensive.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise small class sizes, accessible faculty, and a supportive, hands-on learning environment. The university offers diverse courses and good campus maintenance.
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology is one of the best universities in Kenya, as a personal opinion and one that is recommended nationally. I went there first because it was a few kilometres away from home and I wanted the experience of living alone and generally to feel like an adult. It was home away from home, that I even stayed one year later even after graduation. The lecturers were quite tough which was a good thing because I almost didn't graduate because I had missed a few classes. All my practical units that required extra coursework outside class always had the lecturers in attendance even when they didn't have to. My lecturers were very friendly and very practical on what the course I did would translate to once I finished. The security was very good especially for a single female young lady miles away from home. There was plenty of room to study, from parks all around the university, the student centre and the library. You could also easily access help from the administration and get to the staff offices for extra help from our lectures without going through loops. I loved it there and yes, I would recommend it to a family or friend, depending on the course they plan to do. I was an introvert in campus but I remember trying things like rollball, table tennis, pool, drama which are available and active even till date.
I joined this university, not because it offers a high education but because of its conducive environment and supportive lecturers and professors. You can find people with different cultural backgrounds, which makes the university inclusive. One problem that the university shares with most universities in Nairobi, is the lack of ergonomic chairs in ICT rooms and the library.
Daystar University gtaught me the importance of expressing myself and respectfully disagreeing with opinions that i djid not subscribe to. The university taught me that as much as i am leader i should not be afraid to be hands on on any given task in life and work space. A servant leader leads by example and does not instill fear to those he is leading.
As a first-year Bachelor of Science (Computer Science) student, I can confidently say this university is a complete disappointment. The lack of communication between lecturers and students is shocking—emails go unanswered, and there’s no support when issues arise. The infrastructure is falling apart—old, broken chairs that look like they belong in a primary school, dusty classrooms, and ancient computers that barely function (some seem to be from the early 2000s!). How are we supposed to learn modern computer science on relics? The online unit registration is a nightmare—it’s glitchy, unreliable, and has caused me to lose crucial units. Shockingly, even the fundamental computer science unit (the core of the degree!) was missing from allocations. The administration does nothing to fix these issues. Lecturers are unreliable—showing up late or not at all, with no makeup classes. The systems are always slow, and there are zero extracurricular activities, making campus life dull and isolating. Save your time and money—this place is a scam. If you actually care about your education, look elsewhere.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show