Université de Cergy-Pontoise vs Paulista University - UNIP vs University of Sumatera Utara vs Medan Area University - UMA vs Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: STMIK Triguna Dharma (5.00)
Université de Cergy-Pontoise: wins 0/7 categories
Paulista University - UNIP: wins 0/7 categories
University of Sumatera Utara: wins 0/7 categories
Medan Area University - UMA: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI: wins 0/7 categories
IBBI University: wins 0/7 categories
STMIK Triguna Dharma: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Biomedical Science
Best programme: Information Systems
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Systems
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
2.97
4.64
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
3.45
4.79
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.77
3.64
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
3.93
4.21
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.83
4.21
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.48
4.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and environment
  • +Engaging and diverse programs
  • +Strong career integration and company links
  • +Excellent professors and attentive staff
  • +Modern campus and great facilities
  • +Encouraging student treatment and support
  • +Supportive environment for diverse student aspirations
  • +Practical learning approach blending theory and case studies
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Experiential learning through internships and industry partnerships.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are consistently criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are often found to be lacking.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a persistent problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and inefficiency.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as outdated and not aligned with current industry needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Students often express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from instructors are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, achieving a high rating of 4.25. Student life also scores well at 3.93, alongside a respectable value rating of 3.83. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the weakest area, with a score of 2.97. Professors, accommodation, and internationality fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential development.

With excellent scores in several key areas, this university shines particularly in its **professors**, receiving a near-perfect 4.79, closely followed by its **location** at 4.64. **Student life** and **value** also rate well at 4.21. The university's **internationality** stands as its weakest point, with a rating of 3.64, while **facilities** and **accommodation** are rated solidly at 4.

This university achieves its highest marks in Location and Student Life, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated moderately at 3.33, with Accommodations slightly better at 3.67. The weakest area is Internationality, receiving a score of 3.00, indicating room for improvement in that domain.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were awarded across the board, indicating a consistently strong performance in all surveyed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and value, received a perfect score of 5. With such uniformly high ratings, there are no discernible weakest areas; the institution excels in all aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise the supportive environment, quality teaching, and professional integration. Some mention administrative issues, while ~0% expressed strong negative sentiment.

With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 16 reviews, ~81% are positive. Students praise modern facilities, convenient campus location, and supportive, helpful professors. No negative reviews were provided.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight supportive environments and effective learning strategies combining theory and practical application. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. The student highlights strong internship opportunities and beneficial industry collaboration for career development.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
50%
33%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
50%
31%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
17%
19%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close