Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM vs Universidad La Salle - ULSA vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad La Salle - ULSA: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/2 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/2 categories
Ironhack: wins 0/2 categories
Professional Institute of Therapies and Humanities - IPETH: wins 1/2 categories
Escuela de Diseño del Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes - EDINBA: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Communication
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Applied Medical Sciences
Best programme: Creative Advertising
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
4.75
4.50
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Location
3.98
4.50
4.50
Not rated
5.00
4.00
5.00
Professors
4.37
4.25
4.41
Not rated
3.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
3.86
4.25
4.59
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
2.00
Student life
4.66
4.50
4.63
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Value
4.67
4.25
4.63
Not rated
3.00
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.81
4.00
4.66
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and supportive teaching staff
  • +High-quality, relevant curriculum and academic resources
  • +Excellent facilities and affordability
  • +Strong academic programs and high-quality knowledge acquisition
  • +Emphasis on values and integral, human education
  • +Friendly environment and opportunities for personal growth
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Supportive and understandable teaching with focus on applied learning.
  • +Excellent educational programs and certifications.
  • +Great facilities contributing to a satisfactory experience.
  • +High-quality design education and fostering diverse perspectives
  • +Active, collaborative student life with community and creative experimentation
  • +Commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is poor and unclear.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and inconsistent policies are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Lack of timely and effective communication.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading practices.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors leads to confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving ratings above 4.6. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.37. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.81, closely followed by **Location** and **Internationality**, which are slightly below 4.0. Facilities and Professors also score well.

This university garners strong praise, particularly for its **Facilities**, which received an impressive 4.75. **Location** and **Student Life** also score highly at 4.5. Areas showing solid performance include **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all rated at 4.25. The **Accomodation** is the weakest area, though still rated well at 4.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality all received perfect marks, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. Value also stands out with a top rating. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a moderate score of 3. Location also performed well, but was not as strong as the top-rated categories.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these aspects. However, accommodation and internationality are notable weaknesses, scoring significantly lower. Value for money is also rated highly.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 10 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.7/5. Students praise the rigorous and relevant curriculum, supportive and expert teaching staff, and excellent facilities.

With an average rating of 4.31/5, ~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising high academic quality, skill development, and values. A small portion (~12%) mentions areas for improvement, such as location or teacher treatment.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the feedback highlights excellent teachers, effective learning methods, and great facilities. This overwhelmingly positive sentiment (~100%) indicates a strong student satisfaction.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its commitment to creative and socially conscious education, high-quality design programs, and fostering a diverse, collaborative environment. There is no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
70%
44%
67%
0%
50%
100%
100%
4★
30%
44%
39%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
13%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Interdisciplinary and cutting-edge perspective

EDINBA is undoubtedly distinguished by its commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education. As a public institution, it offers access to high-quality design education, fostering diverse perspectives and constant exchange among students. Student life is characterized by an active and collaborative environment, where workshops, exhibitions, and collective projects strengthen a sense of community and encourage creative experimentation. Addressing current challenges in the field of design—such as digitalization, sustainability, and changes in creative processes—the school seeks to prepare its students to respond ethically and innovatively to the demands of the contemporary context.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close