Université de Franche-Comté - UFC vs GEM Alpine Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 122 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Cultural diversity and international student presence
- +Engaging cultural activities
- +Opportunities for cultural exchange
- +Diverse faculty and global insights
- +Innovative and relevant curriculum with real-world application
- +Strong networking and international opportunities
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +International focus and diverse programs
- +Experiential learning and networking opportunities
- +Supportive professors and student community
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world experience
- +Broad curriculum covering all hospitality aspects
- +Study abroad opportunities for global perspective
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Lack of effective teaching and uninspiring course content.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a consistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues lead to disorganization and frustration.
- -Poor communication from the institution causes confusion and unmet expectations.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum concerns are common complaints.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Inflexible policies and a lack of student support create difficulties.
The university demonstrates strong internationality, receiving a rating of 4. Facilities, location, and accommodation are also well-regarded with scores of 3.5. The weakest area appears to be student life, which scored 2. Professors received a respectable rating of 3, and the overall value is also rated at 3.5.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance. Student life stands out as a particularly strong area, closely followed by professors and overall value. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. The university also scores well in facilities, internationality, and location.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths, notably in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both earning a high rating of 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also score very well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 2.83. **Facilities** are rated at 3.5, and **Location** at 3.67, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
Nothing to show
This university performs exceptionally well in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Its location and international student presence are also notable strengths. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, student life, and accommodation, which received moderately lower scores. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid offering, particularly in academic and geographical aspects.
With one positive review and no negative ones, this university is generally well-received. Students highlight cultural diversity as a significant strength.
With a 4.34/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, valuable faculty insights, and innovative, tech-aligned courses. Some highlight group work stress and limited exchange program admission.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% are positive, highlighting international focus, experiential learning, and networking. Some note demanding workloads.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
Nothing to show
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight strong hospitality education, practical experience, and beneficial study abroad programs as key strengths. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
I found a tight-knit community at Ecole Vatel, with valuable networking and experiential learning opportunities. The intimate setting allows professors to tailor their guidance, equipping students with applicable knowledge and skills. This personalized approach motivated me to reach my full potential and feel better about transitioning into the workforce.
