Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs Audencia Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 188 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and real-world focused learning
- +International and experienced faculty
- +Welcoming and diverse community
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Supportive learning environment with good teachers and diverse international community.
- +Excellent facilities and well-designed courses catering to professionals.
- +Ideal student city with good amenities and student-friendly scheduling.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and relevant, practical programs
- +Strong student support and career development resources
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Strong business & data curriculum with active learning
- +Practical, professionalizing business deep dives
- +Encourages self-driven learning
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Poor English communication and support for international students are prevalent.
- -Lack of adequate facilities and resources are noted.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of practical tool training.
- -Unsupportive professors who dismiss constructive criticism.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction and networking.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Superficial academic content and lack of depth in courses.
- -Unprofessional training and limited internship/apprenticeship support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with Student Life (4.35) and Internationality (4.32) emerging as particularly strong aspects. Professors (4.22) and Location (4.25) also received high marks. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, scoring 3.75, while Facilities are rated at 4.03. Value for money is also well-regarded at 4.11.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality standing out as its strongest point. Professors and Value also received commendations. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation, which presents as the weakest rated aspect, followed by Facilities. Student Life and Location are rated well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This university demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in **Internationality** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.26), and **Location** (4.22). Facilities and value also receive solid marks. The weakest area, while still respectable, is **Accomodation** (3.52). Overall, the institution offers a well-rounded experience with distinct advantages in fostering an international and engaging student community.
This institution exhibits a mixed performance according to its ratings. It excels in **Value** (5/5), and receives strong marks for **Professors** (4/5), **Location** (4/5), and **Internationality** (4/5). However, **Accomodation** is a significant weakness, scoring a zero, and **Student Life** also falls short with a 2/5. **Facilities** are rated moderately at 3/5.
University reviews are largely positive (~97%), highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and professional development opportunities. A small amount of feedback mentions struggles with language barriers for international students.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
University reviews are highly positive (~94%), highlighting a great learning environment, good facilities, and an international student community. A small portion (~6%) expressed disappointment with practical training and professor availability.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
~94% of 52 reviews are positive, highlighting excellent teaching, professors, and career preparation. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions superficial course coverage and a lack of practical value.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students praise the balanced curriculum and active pedagogy, highlighting strengths like "Business Deep Dives" for their professionalizing approach.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
