University of Economics in Bratislava vs Schellhammer Business School vs Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará vs Islamia University of Bahawalpur - IUB vs The Mico University College

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará (5.00)
University of Economics in Bratislava: wins 0/5 categories
Schellhammer Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará: wins 2/5 categories
Islamia University of Bahawalpur - IUB: wins 0/5 categories
The Mico University College: wins 2/5 categories
University of Prešov - UNIPO: wins 0/5 categories
The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga - UTC: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Management
Best programme: Business Administration and Economics
Best programme: Development
Best programme: Analytical Chemistry
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
2.00
5.00
Win
3.90
4.50
2.00
4.00
Location
4.50
1.89
5.00
4.67
5.00
2.67
5.00
Professors
3.50
2.44
4.00
4.10
4.50
2.33
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.00
2.89
3.00
3.70
4.50
Win
2.33
4.00
Student life
3.50
2.00
5.00
4.10
4.50
2.00
5.00
Value
3.00
1.67
3.00
4.10
5.00
Win
2.33
4.00
Accommodation
2.50
2.00
5.00
Win
3.40
4.50
2.33
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Wide program selection in the capital.
  • +Progressive teaching methods used by some instructors.
  • +Business Management program valued for practical usefulness.
  • +International environment and diverse professors
  • +Attractive location and lifestyle
  • +Engaging lectures and beneficial academic programs
  • +State-of-the-art labs and diverse research fields
  • +Highly qualified professors and valuable networking opportunities
  • +Practical experience and job readiness through scholarships
  • +Excellent faculty and staff support
  • +Quality education and knowledge
  • +Positive campus environment and discipline
  • +supportive and helpful lectures
  • +positive and peaceful environment
  • +development of teaching skills
  • +Effective learning and teaching methods
  • +Supportive and helpful instructors
  • +Engaging and useful course content
  • +Small class sizes and personal professor support
  • +Numerous academic and social involvement opportunities
  • +Rewarding and positive overall experience
Cons
  • -Unengaging and outdated academic content.
  • -Lack of practical application and international opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to inconsistent practices and poor communication.
  • -Lack of accreditation and recognition invalidates degrees and wastes money.
  • -Unreliable course delivery and abrupt program changes disregard student efforts.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hindered learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication regarding academic and career support was a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure need improvement.
  • -Lack of proper resources and support hinders student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
  • -Lack of adequate support for students' academic and personal needs.
  • -Incompetent professors and subpar education.
  • -Disorganized administration and bureaucratic issues.
  • -Irrelevant curriculum and contradictory information.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

Performance is particularly strong in location, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation and internationality represent areas needing significant improvement, indicated by lower scores. Overall, the university presents a mixed profile with average ratings in facilities, professors, student life, and value.

Analysis of university ratings reveals a varied picture. The institution excels in **Internationality**, receiving a strong 2.89. Conversely, **Value** is the weakest area, scoring a low 1.67. Other aspects, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation, fall within a similar moderate range, generally around the 2.0 mark.

Across several key aspects, this institution receives commendable scores. It excels in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all earning a perfect five stars. While professors and internationality are rated well, they represent areas for potential improvement with scores of four and three, respectively. The university also scores a three for its overall value.

This institution scores exceptionally well in **location**, achieving a remarkable 4.67 out of 5. Other strong areas include **professors**, **student life**, and **value**, all rated at a solid 4.1. Conversely, **accommodation** emerged as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.4. **Facilities** and **internationality** fall in the mid-range, at 3.9 and 3.7 respectively.

This institution garners excellent reviews across the board. Its standout feature is its prime location, earning a perfect score. Academically and in terms of student experience, it scores highly, with facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and internationality all receiving 4.5 stars. The overall value is also rated exceptionally at 5 stars.

Performance across various aspects of this institution shows a mixed picture. The strongest areas are Location and Accommodations, as well as Internationality and Value, all receiving a rating of approximately 2.67. Conversely, Facilities and Student Life are identified as weaker areas, both scoring a 2. The quality of Professors also sits in the middle, with a rating of 2.33.

Excelling in its core academic and experiential offerings, this institution garners top marks for its Professors, Location, and Student Life, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and Accommodation are well-regarded, achieving solid ratings. Internationality and the overall Value for students also stand out positively. While no areas received low scores, Facilities and Accommodation represent areas with slightly more room for enhancement compared to the stellar performance in teaching, setting, and campus engagement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews are split, with a 3/5 average rating. Approximately 50% of feedback is negative, highlighting a need for modernized teaching and more practical, international projects. Positive comments mention the capital location and program variety.

Negative feedback dominates, with ~56% of reviews expressing significant dissatisfaction regarding academic recognition and inconsistent practices. Positive comments highlight location and international atmosphere.

The single review is highly positive, with ~100% sentiment. It highlights excellent laboratories, research opportunities, qualified professors, and valuable networking leading to employment. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.3/5, ~80% of 10 reviews are positive, highlighting good discipline, faculty efforts, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) exists.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are highly positive, ~100% are 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional experience, helpful lectures, and friendly environment, recommending it for aspiring teachers.

All three university reviews are negative, with an average rating of 1.67 out of 5. Students describe the institution as disorganized and the education as subpar, with incompetent professors and irrelevant study programs.

With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive sentiment, feedback highlights a rewarding academic experience with supportive, small-to-mid-sized classes. Students also value numerous academic and social involvement opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
100%
60%
50%
0%
0%
4★
50%
22%
0%
20%
50%
0%
100%
3★
0%
22%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
2★
50%
0%
0%
10%
0%
67%
0%
1★
0%
56%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Avoid it if you can.

I have just done my Masters at SBS (MA in Organisational Psychology) and below I want to provide the full, unfortunately not so positive, picture. I have no clue where all the positive reviews are coming from – most likely they are paying for them as 99% of them do not reflect reality at all. As it doesn't fit in 1 review, I will split it, to offer the full picture. Contact me if you’d like to know more. Let's start positively – I have met several very knowledgeable and nice people among the teachers. Some are truly willing to teach you and help you grow. But do note that these people are not paid enough and outside of their actual teaching hours which means you will receive little to no support outside class unless the teacher is willing to go the extra mile with no compensation. This is where the „positives“ end. Organisationally – tuition fees are unclear, they will charge you whatever they can get away with based on your nationality (e.g. Mozambique 700eur to Netherlands 12000eur so quite the range) and you will find out randomly when you talk to your peers after enrolling. This will be labelled as „scholarship“ but it doesn’t have anything to do with your previous grades or performance. Everything is payable as opposed to standard practice in serious academic institutions - for example if you need thesis deadline extension, it is, of course, possible - for about 2K EUR. Everything and anything you pay them is non-refundable, of course. There is also insanely high staff turnover, as usually the better teachers leave the moment they find a better job in the area - often these teachers must teach there because the job market in Malaga/Cadiz province is ridiculously saturated and it is not easy to find another employment. Career days are a joke – people from hotels come to recruit cheap labour (600eur/month internship or unpaid at all) but no real professional opportunities are offered – if by some miracle you find anything suitable for you, the uni will charge you money as they have „provided“ you with this opportunity. Personally I was advised and referred several times by a staff member who went the extra mile with my CV and job applications but this is not the norm, as they definitely don't have the resources to do this for everyone. Academically – they should not have the right to call themselves a higher educational institution. There is no clear curriculum, they are changing subjects all the time – if you dared to apply it will certainly not be the same subjects as are listed on the website. For which they have a little legal note written there but that is just to cover their behinds obviously. Teachers are preparing their own syllabus with almost a free-hand, often far from what would be challenging on an actual Masters academical level. Unfortunately, AI use for cheating purposes is not strictly punished - oftentimes students will get away with it despite the instructors' full awareness of this practice, as the instructors do not have the resources to penalise everyone for it as would be the standard practice in any other reputable academic institution. It's very demotivating to be putting in organic, honest work while many just pass by using AI for every single thought they're supposed to produce scot-free. Language classes are a joke – they do not offer ANY of the languages listed online as they do not have the teachers for them. There is a Spanish class – divided between beginners and those who have already come across it, so if you’d think of improving your Spanish from B2 and higher level - don‘t even think about it as the „non-beginner“ class will not be challenging enough by far. There are English classes which are „mandatory“ for students with lack of English skills but again, no courses on e.g. Business English provided, which are a standard at other universities. Thesis writing is an absolute chaos. The guidelines are extremely vague and sometimes conflicting with what is said in class. Do not expect actual academic support – you will choose your topic and you’ll be asigned „Thesis Advisor“ which will be one of the underpaid teachers who will NOT be informed of this assignment and thus will NOT be compensated for it (as they are only paid for teaching hours and not full-time). This means that depending on your TA you will either receive some minor support out of the potential „goodness“ of the specific teacher but in reality, all is decided and „reviewed“ by the Dean - currently Prof. Sousa. „Reviewed“ is because he will only judge based on whether you have followed their template mainly regarding formatting but not content. Which means when you ask for feedback on your 60 page document you’ll often receive „Please follow the template“ which will get your thesis to „passing“ grade but if you want to actually better yourself in academic research and writing, don’t expect that here since their regular procedure doesn't strive to help every student get to their best. Grading is thus based not on content or someone actually thoroughly reading your thesis (nor there are clear grading guidelines as is more than common in other universities). Facilities – the building on campus is okay, but doesn‘t reflect the tuition amount at all. It is far from everything which means you either have to pay for school bus (expensive), figure out Spanish public transport (bus is about 7min walk) or have a car/motorcycle. There is a cafe on campus which is owned by the owners of SBS with a minor discount for SBS students but that means that there is not even a microwave or water kettle available for students - so that they would go spend money in that cafe if they want to have hot meal during their day. For people considering to apply: please be warned – if you can choose another institution for your development, do so. This university will not challenge you academically nor professionaly. It is a deceiving marketing practice at the very least – scam is the correct word unfortunately. Students that were seen sleeping/obviously using AI to answer absolutely basic (definitely not Masters level of knowledge required) questions asked by teachers IN CLASS then use AI to write on their LinkedIn how enriching and challenging this experience was after their graduation. Moreover, the university praises and advocates for the above mentioned fake social media behaviour even though they are well-aware of the scam they are running and the quality of students they enroll – no entrance exams required, of course. In fact, the university administration used AI to prepare their graduation speech for last year :) Make of that what you will. If you have applied and now cannot go back as you would loose all the tuition fees paid: challenge yourself during this time. Make sure to do all your courses diligently so that you can make the most out of this experience focusing on your academic growth. Ask an external thesis advisor to guide you if you want to actually improve your academic research and writing skills. Do the voluntary tasks during the courses, ask the teachers you deem knowledgeable and interesting for more info about their field of expertise, additional literature etc. You have to make it count yourself, as no one else will in this place – once you paid, your growth and development is irrelevant to the university with the exception of a few staff members that care. I have also submitted this review via Google, see how they don't reply as opposed to the positive ones, because they know all of the above is true :)

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close