IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs HEC Paris vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 478 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Vibrant student life and positive campus experience
- +International environment and engaging professors
- +Strong academic programs and modern facilities
- +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
- +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
- +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +Excellent academic programs and expert professors
- +Strong career opportunities and global outlook
- +Supportive community and vibrant campus life
- +International opportunities and diverse environment
- +Practical, high-quality teaching from experienced professionals
- +Strong alumni network and career preparation
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- +Academic rigor and intellectual challenge
- +Personal growth and skill development
- +Career advancement and practical relevance
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Concerns exist regarding the academic quality and professor engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
- -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
- -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and organizational issues severely hinder the program.
- -Limited career prospects and a lack of external recognition disappoint students.
- -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with a focus on imposing viewpoints rather than fostering discussion.
- -Superficial academic coverage and lack of practical value
- -High tuition costs not justified by the quality of education
- -Limited career support, like finding internships
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
- -A lack of administrative support and poor communication causes frustration.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized as being below expectations.
Internationality and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest points, both receiving ratings above 4.5. Location also scores highly. Conversely, Accommodations represent the weakest area with a rating of 3.92. Facilities and Professors are rated moderately well, while Value stands out as a strong performer at 4.31.
Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
This institution receives strong marks for its Internationality, scoring a remarkable 4.44. Student Life and Value are also highly rated at 4.19 and 4.17 respectively. Facilities and Accommodations are well-regarded with scores of 4 and 3.97. The university's Professors, with a 3.97 rating, and Location, at 3.75, represent areas that could be further enhanced.
Location and Internationality stand out as the university's strongest points, both receiving ratings above 4.3. Student Life is also well-regarded. Accommodation presents the most significant area for improvement, with the lowest rating. Professors, Facilities, and Value fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential enhancement to complement the university's more robust aspects.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
This institution garners very strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Exceptional scores were awarded for Professors (4.86) and Internationality (4.71). Facilities and Student Life also received high marks (4.6 each). The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.75. Value and Location received solid, though not top-tier, scores.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 and 234 positive reviews (approximately 91%), students highly recommend the university for its engaging programs, international environment, and vibrant student life. Very limited negative feedback (approximately 0.8%) exists.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a pleasant campus, strong community, and excellent career opportunities. A small portion of feedback (approx. 11%) expresses concerns about administrative inefficiencies and course organization.
Approximately 95.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting global opportunities, practical learning, and a multicultural environment. A small percentage of feedback (~4.4%) expressed disappointment with academic depth and professional training.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 4.57/5. Students highlight academic excellence, intellectual rigor, a human learning experience, and career advancement. No negative feedback was provided.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
Very international and interesting place to be and opens a lot of opportunities, however the administration is very french and facilities are subpar (gym, classrooms) meaning the academic affairs is pretty much useless and lastly we are graded on a curve which can create a toxic environment because of the competition. With that being said the pros outweighs the cons by far.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
