IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs Audencia Business School vs Excelia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 422 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
- +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
- +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
- +High-quality faculty and well-designed academic programs
- +Diverse international student community and networking opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and desirable city location for students
- +High-quality teaching from professors and speakers
- +International environment and student diversity
- +Practical curriculum and preparation for professional challenges
- +Quality education and specialized pathways
- +Vibrant campus life and student activities
- +Practical experience and professional connections
- +Diverse and multicultural atmosphere with approachable professors and quality teaching.
- +Strong support for work-study placements and professional integration.
- +Practical, hands-on learning experiences and networking opportunities.
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
- -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
- -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of practical training.
- -Unresponsive and critical professors.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction and networking.
- -Superficial academic content lacking depth and practical value
- -Unprofessional training and insufficient internship/apprenticeship support
- -Courses not aligning with student expectations or desired specializations
- -Poor teaching quality and unhelpful professors
- -Disorganized administration and irrelevant course content
- -High cost for unengaging and outdated programs
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and is poorly delivered.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.
An overview of the university's ratings reveals several strengths. Notably, Internationality stands out with the highest score, indicating a particularly welcoming and diverse environment. Professors and Value also received high marks, suggesting strong academic instruction and a good return on investment. On the other hand, Accomodation received the lowest rating, pointing to a potential area for improvement. Facilities and Student Life also scored moderately.
This university exhibits a generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Internationality, closely followed by Student Life and Location, all receiving high scores above 4.2. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest category, with the lowest rating of 3.61. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating areas of consistent, good performance.
Assessing the university's performance reveals distinct strengths and areas for improvement. The location stands out with the highest rating, closely followed by student life. Accommodation, however, presents the lowest score, indicating a potential area requiring attention. Other metrics, including facilities, professors, internationality, and value, fall within a mid-range, demonstrating a generally solid but not exceptional performance.
Performance across surveyed categories shows a diverse range of feedback. The university excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving exceptionally high scores. In contrast, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Value are rated moderately well, indicating room for improvement.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 95% of reviews are positive. Students praise the learning environment, good installations, and the city. A small percentage of feedback (~5%) mentions disappointment with theoretical classes and professor availability.
Most reviews are positive (~86%), praising teaching quality, cultural diversity, and modern infrastructure. A small number (~5%) mention superficial subject coverage or lack of practical value.
Most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting good knowledge transfer, specialization options, practical experience, and a vibrant campus life. A small portion of negative feedback (~8%) mentions unprepared professors and organizational issues.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 67% of students rating it highly. Recurring themes include a friendly, multicultural atmosphere, supportive professors, and excellent preparation for professional life through practical experiences and group projects.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
