IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs Audencia Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 395 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
- +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
- +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
- +High-quality faculty and well-designed academic programs
- +Diverse international student community and networking opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and desirable city location for students
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +High-quality teaching from professors and speakers
- +International environment and student diversity
- +Practical curriculum and preparation for professional challenges
- +Diverse and multicultural atmosphere with approachable professors and quality teaching.
- +Strong support for work-study placements and professional integration.
- +Practical, hands-on learning experiences and networking opportunities.
- +Strong career advancement and market-relevant skills.
- +High-quality faculty and engaging curriculum.
- +Welcoming community and supportive staff.
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
- -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
- -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of practical training.
- -Unresponsive and critical professors.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction and networking.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Superficial academic content lacking depth and practical value
- -Unprofessional training and insufficient internship/apprenticeship support
- -Courses not aligning with student expectations or desired specializations
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and is poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are prevalent.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.
An overview of the university's ratings reveals several strengths. Notably, Internationality stands out with the highest score, indicating a particularly welcoming and diverse environment. Professors and Value also received high marks, suggesting strong academic instruction and a good return on investment. On the other hand, Accomodation received the lowest rating, pointing to a potential area for improvement. Facilities and Student Life also scored moderately.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This university exhibits a generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Internationality, closely followed by Student Life and Location, all receiving high scores above 4.2. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest category, with the lowest rating of 3.61. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating areas of consistent, good performance.
Performance across surveyed categories shows a diverse range of feedback. The university excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving exceptionally high scores. In contrast, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Value are rated moderately well, indicating room for improvement.
This university garners exceptional scores in academic and social aspects, with Professors receiving a near-perfect 4.8 and Internationality a strong 4.6. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded at 4.33. Location and Value are solid at 4.5 and 4 respectively. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, scoring a significantly lower 3.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 95% of reviews are positive. Students praise the learning environment, good installations, and the city. A small percentage of feedback (~5%) mentions disappointment with theoretical classes and professor availability.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Most reviews are positive (~86%), praising teaching quality, cultural diversity, and modern infrastructure. A small number (~5%) mention superficial subject coverage or lack of practical value.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 67% of students rating it highly. Recurring themes include a friendly, multicultural atmosphere, supportive professors, and excellent preparation for professional life through practical experiences and group projects.
With 100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight strong career advancement and valuable skills gained. Frequent themes include high-quality courses, competent professors, and practical relevance. Some students desired stronger post-graduation support and a more engaged alumni network.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
