IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs NEOMA Business School vs Excelia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 431 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
- +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
- +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
- +Flexible, international curriculum shaping studies.
- +Strong networking and community through associations and alumni.
- +Engaging and professional teaching with diverse student body.
- +Diverse, multicultural environment and global opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and practical, well-structured curriculum
- +Strong alumni network and enriching student experience
- +High-quality education with specialized pathways and practical application
- +Supportive community and vibrant campus life with numerous activities
- +Strong industry connections and opportunities for real-world experience
- +Strong academic support and faculty availability
- +Practical, real-world business focus and company connections
- +Emphasis on international perspective and personal/professional development
- +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Unique multi-city European study experience
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
- -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
- -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is prevalent.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical value were disappointing.
- -The program's focus did not align with student expectations or career goals.
- -High tuition costs were not justified by the perceived quality of education and career support.
- -Poor quality of teaching and irrelevant course content.
- -Significant organizational and administrative problems.
- -High cost with little perceived value.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are major dissatisfactions.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.
Examining the provided university ratings reveals a strong showing in several key areas. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated category, closely followed by Student Life and Value, indicating significant strengths in these aspects. Facilities represent the lowest-scoring area, suggesting room for improvement compared to other metrics. The remaining categories, Professors, Location, and Accomodation, fall within a relatively narrow and positive range.
Internationality, Location, and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest attributes, each scoring above 4.25. The university also received a solid rating for its facilities and professors. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a score of 3.59. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in student experience and international appeal.
Overall, this institution receives a balanced set of ratings. Its strongest areas are **Location** (4.16) and **Student Life** (4.11), indicating positive student experiences in these regards. **Accomodation**, however, presents the weakest point at 3.37. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Internationality fall within a mid-to-high range, suggesting generally satisfactory performance across these aspects.
Across several key areas, this institution garners exceptionally high ratings. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value all received outstanding scores of 4.75. Location and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.5. This indicates a consistently positive experience for students, with its strongest attributes lying in its academic and residential offerings.
This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.
With ~74% of reviews being positive, students praise the program's flexibility, international focus, and professionalizing opportunities. Some mention assignments being difficult to balance with revision. No negative reviews were recorded.
~95% of reviews are positive, highlighting multicultural environments, enriching experiences, and good quality teaching. A small portion of feedback (~5%) expresses disappointment with academic depth and practical value.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good knowledge transfer, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. Just ~7.4% of feedback is negative, citing unprepared professors and organizational issues.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise approachable professors and practical, international learning experiences. Some note campus facilities and student life could be improved with more funding.
Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
