IÉSEG School of Management vs INSEAD Business School vs Audencia Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 353 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +High-quality faculty and relevant curriculum
- +Diverse and international peer community
- +Practical learning and career opportunities
- +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
- +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
- +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Practical, experiential learning with real-world application.
- +Strong international focus, diversity, and global opportunities.
- +Supportive faculty and high-quality teaching.
- +Strong academic programs blending hospitality and business.
- +Abundant opportunities and supportive environment.
- +Welcoming student community and personal development focus.
- +Practical and hands-on learning
- +Study abroad opportunities and international exposure
- +Professional and passionate professors
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of effective communication and support leaves students feeling ignored.
- -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
- -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Expensive tuition for irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors.
- -Lack of student motivation and engagement in academics.
- -Disorganized and uncommunicative administration.
- -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of responsiveness from staff and instructors.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from instructors and the university is a common complaint.
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
With exceptional scores, this institution excels in its professorial staff, earning a near-perfect 4.7. Accommodation and value are also highly rated, both exceeding 4.5. The university demonstrates strong international appeal and impressive facilities, each scoring 4.4. Student life is solid at 4.0. The location, however, is the lowest-rated aspect at 3.7.
Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution garners particularly high marks for Student Life, averaging over 4.16, with Location also scoring well at 4.08. Professors and Internationality are also rated positively at a solid 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a 3.25 rating, while Facilities and Value are mid-range.
This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly for its **Internationality**, which stands out at 4.93. Facilities and Student Life also score highly, both above 4.7. Accommodation and Value are similarly strong. Professors and Location receive solid scores, though slightly lower than other categories. The university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with a distinct strength in its global appeal and a consistently positive experience for students.
Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a strong academic reputation. Professors are exceptionally rated at 4.7, with location and internationality also scoring highly at 4.3. Student life and accommodation are similarly rated at approximately 3.78, while facilities present the weakest area with a score of 3.9. Overall, the university offers good value at 4.2.
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
With a ~86% positive rating from 7 reviews, students highlight atmosphere, challenging programs, and learning new business skills. Some mention a packed curriculum and dislike of program location.
With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical and international teaching, supportive staff, and a great environment. One review (around 8%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching quality.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.76/5. Students highlight excellent curriculum, ample opportunities, and strong institutional support. There is no negative feedback reported.
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight practical, dynamic classes, passionate professors, and beneficial study abroad programs that enhance skills and career prospects. There is no negative feedback.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
like the atmosphere. Challenging program. Dislike the location of the program, too far away from city. The curriculum is very packed and the peers are very nice. Enjoying the program so far and defintely learning new business skills.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
I found a tight-knit community at Ecole Vatel, with valuable networking and experiential learning opportunities. The intimate setting allows professors to tailor their guidance, equipping students with applicable knowledge and skills. This personalized approach motivated me to reach my full potential and feel better about transitioning into the workforce.
