University of Ghana - UG vs Universidad Técnica del Norte - UTN vs Toulouse School of Management vs Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology - KNUST vs Sunyani Technical University - STU
Side-by-side comparison from 476 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
- +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
- +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
Nothing to show
- +Robust academic programs with real-world application
- +International environment with diverse students and experienced professors
- +Opportunities for personal growth and global experience
- +Engaging and practical courses
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong academic standards and critical thinking focus
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive campus environment and good facilities
- +Effective and accessible online management system
- +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers.
- +Strong academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
- +Well-structured programs with practical project engagement.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
- -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
Nothing to show
- -Chaotic administration and lack of support.
- -Unfair teaching practices and vague, difficult exams.
- -Poor administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities.
- -Lack of student welfare and support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to confusion.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.
Nothing to show
Here's a summary of the university ratings:
Boasting a strong score in Location (4.0), this institution also receives solid marks for Professors and Student Life, both at 3.7. Facilities and Internationality are rated moderately at 3.3. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 2.7. Value is also rated moderately at 3.3.
This university demonstrates a strong profile across multiple metrics. Location and Value are particularly highly rated, suggesting excellent external appeal and perceived worth. Student Life and Professors also receive commendations, indicating positive campus engagement and academic quality. Accommodation, however, stands out as the weakest area, receiving a notably lower score compared to other aspects. Internationality and Facilities present solid, above-average performance.
This university garners strong marks in several key areas, notably excelling in its **location** with a near-perfect score. **Professors**, **student life**, and **value** also receive high praise. However, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing. **Facilities** and **internationality** receive solid, positive ratings, contributing to an overall favorable assessment.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors (4.35)** and **value (4.25)**, as well as a well-regarded **student life (4)**. The **location (3.94)** also receives positive feedback. However, **facilities (3.05)** represent the weakest area according to these ratings, with **accommodation (3.4)** and **internationality (3.4)** falling in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.
Nothing to show
With a 3.67/5 average rating, most reviews are positive, highlighting a transformative academic journey with excellent curricula and experienced professors. Negative feedback (~33%) points to administrative chaos and unfair teaching practices.
With a 4.41/5 average rating from 197 reviews, ~99.5% of feedback is positive, highlighting engaging courses, knowledgeable professors, and practical learning. A single negative review noted insufficient solar power generation content.
With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students highlight good facilities, engaging academics, and dedicated lecturers. A recurring challenge is the lack of student accommodation.
With a high average rating of 4.35/5 from 20 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise friendly atmospheres, approachable and knowledgeable lecturers, and a strong foundation for academic and personal growth. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.
Nothing to show
My journey at TSM has been nothing short of transformative. The commitment to academic excellence, coupled with international teachers, has provided me with a robust education. The emphasis on diversity and inclusion was an excellent environment for my personal growth. The curriculum is designed to blend theory with real-world application and equips students with the skills necessary to thrive in a dynamic global landscape. The possibility of a university exchange abroad has been a pivotal aspect of my education, providing me with the opportunity to immerse myself in a different culture and educational system. My dream of living and working abroad was made possible thank to TSM. In conclusion, TSM is a school that I would recommend without a doubt to anyone that wish to acquire business excellence in a multicultural environment.
In 2023, my University, KNUST, won the overall best in the world in education. I like the fact that my University gives me the best. Anyone looking for the University now should check through KNUST. There are a lot of opportunities KNUST has for you. Our campuses always look stunning. There are parts where you get to meet Managing Directors of businesses sharing live journeys with us, and I love that.
I like the school because of their Technology level. They have a very responsive advanced management system which make students access all their education needs online and with ease. They teach very well to the understanding of the students. It deserves to be an international school. Is really a good school. But the only thing not actually interesting about it is their school fees are high.
My experience at this university has been highly rewarding. The programme is well-structured, with dedicated lecturers who provide strong academic and professional guidance. I particularly appreciated the supportive learning environment, access to resources, and opportunities to engage in practical projects that enhanced my knowledge. The university also promotes diversity and collaboration, which made the learning experience more enriching. While there could be improvements in administrative processes, overall, I would strongly recommend this university to anyone seeking quality education and personal growth.
Nothing to show