University of Ghana - UG vs Dr. Hilla Limann Technical University - WTU vs SD Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - UBIDS vs Collin College vs Simon Diedong Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - SDD-UBIDS

Side-by-side comparison from 251 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Simon Diedong Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - SDD-UBIDS (5.00)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 2/7 categories
Dr. Hilla Limann Technical University - WTU: wins 0/7 categories
SD Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - UBIDS: wins 0/7 categories
Collin College: wins 0/7 categories
Simon Diedong Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - SDD-UBIDS: wins 1/7 categories
Dr Hilla Limann Technical University - DHLTU: wins 0/7 categories
Faculty of Sport of University of Porto: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Plano, Texas, United States
2.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Animation and Videogame Design
Best programme: Sports and Exercise Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.32
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.08
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.48
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful professors
  • +Strong support for student success
  • +Accommodation availability and proximity
  • +Quality of programs offered

Nothing to show

  • +Strong sports programs and expert faculty
  • +Positive professional outcomes and career prospects
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Repetitive and uncaring professors impact learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Unclear communication and lack of student support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a robust 4.5, facilities stand out as the university's strongest attribute. Student life also garners a positive 4. Conversely, professors and accommodation are areas for development, each receiving a rating of 3. Location and internationality are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3 respectively, with value also sitting at a 3.

This institution shines particularly bright in **Value**, receiving a perfect score. Student Life and Professors also stand out with strong ratings. Areas that could see improvement include Facilities, Location, and Accommodation, all of which are rated at an average level. Internationality also falls into this mid-range category.

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were awarded for facilities, professors, location, and student life, all receiving a perfect score of 5. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the lowest-rated aspect at 3. Internationality and overall value were rated positively at 4, indicating a well-rounded university experience with specific areas for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 2.5/5 average, feedback is split equally. Positive comments praise professors' knowledge and helpfulness, while negative reviews cite repetitive and uncaring instructors.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university is highly recommended. One reviewer praised the academic offerings, noting accommodation distance as a minor, normal challenge.

Nothing to show

This university is highly recommended (~100% positive) for its sports programs and professional opportunities. Some areas are noted as needing renovation, but improvements are underway.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
47%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
100%
3★
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close