University of Ghana - UG vs Tamale Technical University - TATU vs University for Development Studies - UDS vs SSML of Varese vs Tamale College of Education - TACE
Side-by-side comparison from 257 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
- +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
- +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
- +Skill acquisition for career and future
- +Project support from lecturers
- +Desire for degree-level programs
Nothing to show
- +Small class sizes fostering strong professor and student rapport and personalized support.
- +Appreciated curriculum and teaching methods contributing to a positive learning experience.
- +Friendly and intimate university environment.
- +Conducive and bright environment.
- +Proper movement layout.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and approachable faculty focused on real-world concepts
- +Opportunities for academic engagement and personal initiative
- +Strong academic environment and formative experiences
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
- -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are disappointing.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff causes dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and support from faculty and staff are inadequate.
Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.
Academic excellence and international appeal are clear strengths, evidenced by high ratings for professors (4.5) and internationality (4). The university also scores well in location (4) and value (4.5). However, areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation received more moderate scores of 3, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in its academic offerings, with professors receiving a remarkable 4.5 rating. Student life and value for money also score positively. However, the university's facilities and internationality lag somewhat behind. The most significant area for improvement is accommodation, which received a very low rating of 1.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **student life**, both receiving a high rating of 4. Furthermore, its **value** is also rated positively at 4. Conversely, the university faces challenges in **professors** and **internationality**, both scoring a low 1. **Facilities** and **accommodation** fall within the mid-range with scores of 2 and 3 respectively.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university garners a generally positive reception, with its strongest areas being **Professors (4.5)** and **Student Life (4)**. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.5)** emerged as the weakest point in the evaluation. Other aspects such as Facilities, Location, Internationality, and Value all received moderate scores, contributing to a balanced overall impression.
Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, the 2 reviews were entirely positive. Students highlighted lectures' assistance with projects and skill acquisition for future careers.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students praise the friendly, intimate learning environment and good English instruction. Minor suggestions include updating classroom furniture and adding a cafeteria.
The sole review praises the college's conducive environment and proper layout. With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive.
Nothing to show
With a 4.5/5 average rating, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise supportive faculty and opportunities for growth, noting success often hinges on personal initiative.
Studying Geography at the University of Ghana gave me a strong balance between academic theory and real world perspective. The program encouraged critical thinking about environmental systems, urban development, and human interactions with space, which helped me develop a more analytical way of understanding everyday challenges. Beyond the classroom, the environment was diverse and intellectually engaging, with opportunities to collaborate, research, and explore different viewpoints. Overall, my experience at the University of Ghana was both grounding and expansive, shaping how I approach problem solving and structured thinking today.
It's not a university but it's a training ground to acquire skills for a purpose and future. What I like about this is Lectures are always ready to assist students to undertake projects which enhance their ability. What I dislike about the school is students are being stressed with series of projects with limited time.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show