University of Ghana - UG vs Wisconsin International University College vs Universidad Santa Maria - USM vs Dr. Hilla Limann Technical University - WTU vs SD Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - UBIDS

Side-by-side comparison from 294 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Simon Diedong Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - SDD-UBIDS (5.00)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 4/7 categories
Wisconsin International University College: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Santa Maria - USM: wins 0/7 categories
Dr. Hilla Limann Technical University - WTU: wins 0/7 categories
SD Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - UBIDS: wins 0/7 categories
Simon Diedong Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies - SDD-UBIDS: wins 1/7 categories
Dr Hilla Limann Technical University - DHLTU: wins 0/7 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Win
3.50
3.92
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.32
4.50
Win
3.83
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.25
Win
4.00
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.08
Win
3.83
3.95
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.29
Win
4.17
4.03
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.22
3.67
3.70
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.48
3.83
Win
2.93
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Knowledgeable and engaging lecturers
  • +Positive learning environment and campus facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and curriculum
  • +Excellent professors and academic staff
  • +Good facilities and resources
  • +Practical learning opportunities and patient access

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Accommodation availability and proximity
  • +Quality of programs offered

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and student comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support leads to frustration.
  • -Lack of teacher engagement and support for student understanding.
  • -Outdated digital infrastructure and difficulty accessing information.
  • -Perceived low academic standards and a focus on quantity over quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Unclear communication and lack of student support.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

Consider this university's performance: It excels in its Location, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Student Life also stands out with a score of 4.17. The weakest area noted is Facilities, with a 3.5 rating. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid range, generally scoring above 3.5.

Academic strengths emerge prominently, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.2. Student Life and Internationality also score well, reflecting positive campus experiences and a global outlook. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.93. Facilities and Value are moderately rated, suggesting room for improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution shines particularly bright in **Value**, receiving a perfect score. Student Life and Professors also stand out with strong ratings. Areas that could see improvement include Facilities, Location, and Accommodation, all of which are rated at an average level. Internationality also falls into this mid-range category.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

Students highly praise knowledgeable lecturers and a good learning environment, with positive feedback comprising ~83% of reviews. Some notes suggest improvements needed in facilities and classroom availability.

Approximately 74% of 40 reviews are positive, highlighting good professors and facilities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions teacher disengagement and outdated online resources.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university is highly recommended. One reviewer praised the academic offerings, noting accommodation distance as a minor, normal challenge.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
33%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
47%
50%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
11%
17%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

The Ultimate Experience

Wisconsin International University College(WIUC), is one of the top leading private universities in Ghana. There are pros and cons to WIUC. In terms of the positive aspect of the school, the Lecturers are very knowledgeable and highly skilled in their fields. They lecture with understanding and engage students in precise activities that aid the students in learning. Next is the environment. The environment is clean, serene and in order. My favourite place in the school is the Library. As a student, the library is by far the best place to study. The library is clean, spacious, quiet and airconditioned. Every student has their own cubicle to study and avoid distractions. In terms of the negative aspects of the school, unless you are in your second year going, you aren't allowed to use laptops in class. As a technological person, this was a challenge for me. I study better when I type my notes however if I have to write down my notes, I usually miss the important points and get easily distracted. Another con is hangout spots. Besides the cafeteria and hallways, there aren't any spots to hang out with your mates in the school. Honestly, besides these, I can't think of any other cons.

One of the best

I can consider that it is one of the best universities in Venezuela, good functioning of the facilities and excellent teachers. Incredible environment to develop and very good areas for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close