University of Ghana - UG vs Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UPVD vs Maastricht School of Management vs Tamale Technical University - TATU vs University for Development Studies - UDS

Side-by-side comparison from 253 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tamale Technical University - TATU (4.50)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 1/4 categories
Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UPVD: wins 1/4 categories
Maastricht School of Management: wins 0/4 categories
Tamale Technical University - TATU: wins 0/4 categories
University for Development Studies - UDS: wins 0/4 categories
Tamale College of Education - TACE: wins 0/4 categories
Cyprus Aydin University - CAU: wins 2/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Art and Design
Maastricht, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Location
4.32
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Professors
4.25
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
1.00
4.00
Internationality
4.08
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
1.00
4.00
Student life
4.29
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.22
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.48
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Inspiring environment and inspiring professors
  • +Supportive student resources
  • +Diverse and globally-oriented programs

Nothing to show

  • +Skill acquisition for career and future
  • +Project support from lecturers
  • +Desire for degree-level programs

Nothing to show

  • +Conducive and bright environment.
  • +Proper movement layout.
  • +Student-centered approach and excellent scholarships
  • +High-quality teaching and academic programs
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues are a major complaint.
  • -Outdated and inadequate facilities are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of necessary resources and support hinders learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause confusion and delays.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particularly high marks in Professors, Location, and Student Life, all receiving a 4.5 rating. Facilities and Accomodation are also well-regarded, each scoring a 4. While no areas received low ratings, Facilities and Accomodation represent the comparatively lower end of the spectrum among its otherwise excellent scores. Internationality and Value also align with the general strength observed.

Nothing to show

Academic excellence and international appeal are clear strengths, evidenced by high ratings for professors (4.5) and internationality (4). The university also scores well in location (4) and value (4.5). However, areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation received more moderate scores of 3, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **student life**, both receiving a high rating of 4. Furthermore, its **value** is also rated positively at 4. Conversely, the university faces challenges in **professors** and **internationality**, both scoring a low 1. **Facilities** and **accommodation** fall within the mid-range with scores of 2 and 3 respectively.

Offering a compelling overall experience, the institution shines brightest in student life and value, both achieving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. While no area received a low rating, the strongest performance lies in student engagement and perceived worth.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

The university receives excellent feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight strong support systems and a unique learning environment.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the 2 reviews were entirely positive. Students highlighted lectures' assistance with projects and skill acquisition for future careers.

Nothing to show

The sole review praises the college's conducive environment and proper layout. With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive.

This university garners high praise, with ~100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight high-quality teaching and excellent scholarships. A minor suggestion for improvement involves reviewing the university bus schedule and frequency.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
47%
100%
0%
50%
0%
100%
100%
3★
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

75%

It's not a university but it's a training ground to acquire skills for a purpose and future. What I like about this is Lectures are always ready to assist students to undertake projects which enhance their ability. What I dislike about the school is students are being stressed with series of projects with limited time.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close