University of Ghana - UG vs South East European University - SEEU vs Technical University of Mombasa - TUM vs Koforidua Technical University - KTU vs ALL NATIONS UNIVERSITY - ANU

Side-by-side comparison from 290 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Ghana - UG: wins 0/6 categories
South East European University - SEEU: wins 3/6 categories
Technical University of Mombasa - TUM: wins 0/6 categories
Koforidua Technical University - KTU: wins 1/6 categories
ALL NATIONS UNIVERSITY - ANU: wins 1/6 categories
Annamalai University: wins 0/6 categories
Centro Universitário FADERGS: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Mathematics and Computer Science
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Tamil Nadu, India
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.60
Win
3.67
4.00
4.25
2.00
3.00
Location
4.32
4.20
4.23
4.75
4.50
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.25
4.60
4.14
4.63
4.40
1.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.08
5.00
Win
3.05
3.88
4.40
2.00
3.00
Student life
4.29
4.40
3.82
4.63
Win
3.75
1.00
4.00
Value
4.22
4.60
4.14
4.00
4.80
Win
4.00
1.00
Accommodation
3.48
4.40
Win
3.59
4.38
4.25
Not rated
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Supportive and helpful staff and professors
  • +Modern facilities and welcoming campus environment
  • +Career preparation and skill development opportunities
  • +Supportive, friendly lecturers and useful, real-world curriculum
  • +Conducive learning environment with good facilities and moderate fees
  • +Prime coastal location and positive campus atmosphere
  • +Practical and hands-on learning experiences
  • +Effective teaching methods simplifying complex subjects
  • +Strong academic and practical growth opportunities
  • +High academic standards and effective learning through accessible lecturers.
  • +Strong emphasis on student development, discipline, and personal growth.
  • +Support for student initiatives and community engagement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modernization.
  • -Ineffective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of practical experience and institutional partnerships.
  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Communication and transparency regarding policies and opportunities are lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources create significant challenges.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are consistently problematic.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a perfect score of 5. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Value are also remarkably high at 4.6. Student Life and Accommodation are well-regarded at 4.4, while Location, at 4.2, represents the lowest score. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong commitment to its students and academic offerings.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback with its strongest areas being Location and Professors, both receiving high marks. Value is also rated highly. Conversely, Internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower rating compared to other categories. Facilities and Accomodation are rated moderately, while Student Life also falls into the mid-range of assessments.

An assessment of the university reveals a strong showing in several key areas, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.75. Professors and student life also received impressive scores of 4.625. Conversely, internationality was the weakest performing category, scoring 3.875. Facilities and value were rated a solid 4, while accommodation achieved a respectable 4.375.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location (4.5)** and **value (4.8)**, alongside excellent marks for **professors (4.4)** and **internationality (4.4)**. Facilities and accommodation also received positive scores. However, **student life (3.75)** emerged as the comparatively weaker area. Overall, the university presents a strong offering with particular advantages in its setting and affordability.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

With a 4.33 average rating from 6 reviews, all feedback is positive. Students praise convenient campus living, supportive staff, and well-taught courses. Modern facilities and career guidance are also highlighted.

With an average rating of 4.09/5 from 22 reviews, ~82% are positive, highlighting friendly lecturers, useful courses, and good facilities. A small fraction (~4.6%) of feedback noted insufficient practical exposure and institutional partnerships for technical courses.

All eight reviews are positive, averaging 4.63/5. Students highlight practical teaching and hands-on learning experiences. Some minor concerns were raised about delayed exam results and time spent at school.

All 5 reviews were positive, with an average rating of 4.6/5. Recurring themes include high academic standards, supportive lecturers, and modern facilities, contributing to an enriching experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
33%
32%
63%
60%
0%
0%
4★
47%
67%
50%
38%
40%
0%
0%
3★
11%
0%
14%
0%
0%
100%
100%
2★
1%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

Nothing to show

STUDENT SUPPORT

It's a friendly environment to be in since it's located near the coastal beach, the top management usually offer spiritual growth and motivation to all students regardless of ones' faith or color. Also the tuition fees are moderate.

The teaching skills

The skills and ways we were taught was very good and practical.Even in universities we the students must put in 90% of the work(studying) but i think the lectures have made it very simple for me and actually 50% from me would even be more than enough.So the teaching skills are one of the most positive things about the school

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close