Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ vs University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM vs Pontificate Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro - PUC-Rio vs Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Brazilian Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine - IBMR (5.00)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ: wins 0/4 categories
University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM: wins 0/4 categories
Pontificate Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro - PUC-Rio: wins 1/4 categories
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro: wins 1/4 categories
Brazilian Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine - IBMR: wins 2/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Urbanism
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Architecture and Urban Planning
Best programme: Library and Information Science
Best programme: Agriculture
Best programme: Bachelor in ICT
Category ratings
Facilities
3.20
4.00
Not rated
4.25
4.00
4.00
4.50
Win
Location
3.53
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
3.50
4.50
Professors
4.40
4.50
Not rated
4.50
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.27
3.00
Not rated
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Student life
3.57
3.50
Not rated
4.50
4.00
4.50
4.50
Value
4.60
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
5.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.00
2.50
Not rated
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Extensive opportunities for research and extracurricular projects.
  • +High-quality, knowledgeable professors and mentors.
  • +Strong industry connections and company partnerships.
  • +Excellent professors and project encouragement
  • +Strong infrastructure and facilities
  • +Career opportunities and international recognition

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and academic programs
  • +Beautiful campus and welcoming environment
  • +Strong career and professional development opportunities
  • +Highly qualified faculty and diverse educational techniques
  • +Freedom to explore various areas of knowledge
  • +Excellent teaching and professor support
  • +Diverse and inclusive environment
  • +Wide course variety
  • +Practical and accessible learning with helpful professors
  • +Supportive and welcoming environment fostering friendships
  • +Good cost-benefit value and local convenience
Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Concerns exist about the quality of teaching and curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from staff are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are frequently criticized.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
  • -Lack of updated curriculum and resources is a significant concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving very high marks. **Internationality** is also a significant strength. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate ratings, while **Student Life** is also a positive aspect.

The university exhibits strong performance in key areas, particularly in **Value (5)**, **Professors (4.5)**, and **Location (4.5)**. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.5)** stands out as the weakest aspect. Other areas, including Facilities and Student Life, receive solid scores, while Internationality is rated moderately.

Nothing to show

This university garners exceptional marks in several key areas. Location and value are rated a perfect 5, alongside a strong student life and internationality at 4.5. Professors also receive a high rating of 4.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3. Facilities are rated well at 4.25.

Overall, the university garners solid ratings across multiple aspects. It particularly excels in the **Professors** category, achieving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** all received strong marks at 4 out of 5. The lowest rating was for **Accomodation** at 3, indicating this area might benefit from further development. The **Value** proposition is also rated positively at 4.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas such as professors, student life, and internationality, all receiving perfect or near-perfect marks. Value for money is also a standout strength. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, while facilities and location fall in the mid-range. Overall, it offers a highly regarded academic and social experience.

The university receives commendations for its excellent facilities, dedicated professors, and appealing location and student life, all scoring highly. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, with lower scores. The overall value is rated moderately, suggesting room for enhancement in this aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 16 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.44/5. Students highlight enriching experiences, valuable classes, and numerous opportunities for research and projects. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods as minor drawbacks.

With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Positive themes highlight excellent infrastructure, career opportunities, and great laboratories. Minor concerns about room ventilation and bathrooms were noted.

Nothing to show

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the welcoming environment, knowledgeable professors, beautiful campus, and opportunities for academic and professional growth.

Based on one review, the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro is highly rated at 4/5 stars. The positive feedback highlights qualified faculty and a conducive campus environment. Infrastructure and scholarship incentives were noted for improvement.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, students praise the university's great teachers, diverse courses, and supportive professors. The calm, safe environment and inclusive atmosphere are also highlighted, with no negative feedback recorded.

All (100%) reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight excellent quality, great support, and a welcoming environment. They found their studies valuable and a good cost-benefit option.

Rating distribution
5★
44%
0%
0%
50%
0%
50%
100%
4★
56%
100%
0%
50%
100%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close