Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Estácio vs University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM vs Pontificate Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro - PUC-Rio vs Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Brazilian Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine - IBMR (5.00)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ: wins 0/4 categories
Estácio: wins 0/4 categories
University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM: wins 0/4 categories
Pontificate Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro - PUC-Rio: wins 2/4 categories
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro: wins 1/4 categories
Brazilian Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine - IBMR: wins 1/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Urbanism
Sao Paulo, Brazil
4.10
Read more reviews
31 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Architecture and Urban Planning
Best programme: Library and Information Science
Best programme: Agriculture
Best programme: Bachelor in ICT
Category ratings
Facilities
3.06
3.97
Not rated
4.40
4.00
4.00
4.50
Win
Location
3.44
4.03
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
3.50
4.50
Professors
4.33
4.17
Not rated
4.60
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.22
3.23
Not rated
4.60
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Student life
3.41
3.86
Not rated
4.60
Win
4.00
4.50
4.50
Value
4.56
3.70
Not rated
5.00
4.00
5.00
3.00
Accommodation
2.88
3.42
Not rated
3.50
3.00
3.00
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality faculty and learning opportunities
  • +Diverse extracurricular and research options
  • +Strong industry connections and career preparation
  • +Excellent professors and quality teaching
  • +Efficient and helpful student support
  • +User-friendly online platform and good infrastructure

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and robust academic content
  • +Welcoming environment and opportunities for growth
  • +Promising professional prospects and good organization
  • +Highly qualified faculty and diverse educational techniques
  • +Freedom to explore various areas of knowledge
  • +Excellent teaching and professor support
  • +Diverse and inclusive environment
  • +Wide course variety
  • +Practical and accessible learning with helpful professors
  • +Supportive and welcoming environment fostering friendships
  • +Good cost-benefit value and local convenience
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on financial gain over student care.
  • -Lack of adequate support and clear communication, especially for online learners.
  • -Inconsistent teaching methods and poor organization within courses.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from staff are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are frequently criticized.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
  • -Lack of updated curriculum and resources is a significant concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates significant strengths in Value, with a near-perfect rating. Professors and Internationality also received commendably high scores. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other categories. Facilities and Student Life received moderate ratings.

Professors and location stand out as the university's strongest attributes, both receiving ratings above 4.0. Student life and facilities also performed well, indicating positive aspects in campus experience and resources. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation and internationality, which received the lowest scores in the evaluation. The overall value of the university is rated at a respectable 3.7.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, with Location and Value both achieving a perfect 5. Professors, Student Life, and Internationality also stand out with strong ratings of 4.6. Facilities are well-regarded at 4.4. The primary area for improvement identified is Accomodation, which received the lowest score of 3.5.

Overall, the university garners solid ratings across multiple aspects. It particularly excels in the **Professors** category, achieving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** all received strong marks at 4 out of 5. The lowest rating was for **Accomodation** at 3, indicating this area might benefit from further development. The **Value** proposition is also rated positively at 4.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas such as professors, student life, and internationality, all receiving perfect or near-perfect marks. Value for money is also a standout strength. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, while facilities and location fall in the mid-range. Overall, it offers a highly regarded academic and social experience.

The university receives commendations for its excellent facilities, dedicated professors, and appealing location and student life, all scoring highly. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, with lower scores. The overall value is rated moderately, suggesting room for enhancement in this aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most (95%) of reviews are positive, praising rich content, research focus, and numerous opportunities. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods.

Approximately 80% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors, student support, and online platforms. A small percentage of feedback (about 10%) mentions institutional financial focus and lack of support.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.6/5 from 5 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors, great facilities, and academic/professional growth opportunities.

Based on one review, the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro is highly rated at 4/5 stars. The positive feedback highlights qualified faculty and a conducive campus environment. Infrastructure and scholarship incentives were noted for improvement.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, students praise the university's great teachers, diverse courses, and supportive professors. The calm, safe environment and inclusive atmosphere are also highlighted, with no negative feedback recorded.

All (100%) reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight excellent quality, great support, and a welcoming environment. They found their studies valuable and a good cost-benefit option.

Rating distribution
5★
37%
45%
0%
60%
0%
50%
100%
4★
53%
35%
0%
40%
100%
50%
0%
3★
11%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close