Instituto Tecnologico De Saltillo - ITS vs St. Edward's University vs Osun State University vs National University of Mar del Plata vs Adeleke University - AU
Side-by-side comparison from 237 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic standards and career accreditation
- +Emphasis on personal and professional development
- +Strong ethical environment and professional opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Fast-paced academic calendar and excellent learning environment
- +Fun campus life and opportunities for personal growth
- +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
- +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
- +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers
- +High-quality teaching and relevant programs
- +Supportive and interactive learning environment
- +Practical, industry-focused coursework and development
- +Academic excellence and practical skill development
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Conducive learning environment with modern facilities
- +Strong programmes in IT, marketing, design, and web development
- +Opportunities for skill development and advancement
- -Insufficient support and access to outdated facilities and software.
- -Lack of diverse course offerings.
Nothing to show
- -Frustrating administrative and communication problems.
- -Inadequate resources and outdated learning facilities.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support for student well-being is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of academic support are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received zero ratings. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight. The university's performance is uniformly low across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a need for significant improvement in all aspects.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly for its **value**, which received the highest rating. Professors are also highly regarded. Areas requiring improvement include **accommodation** and **internationality**, which received the lowest scores. Facilities, location, and student life fall within a moderate range of positive assessments.
This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university excelling in **Value**, achieving a rating of 4.11. Facilities and Professors also received strong scores around 3.89. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the weakest area, scoring 3.11. Location and Student Life were rated moderately at 3.56, with Accommodation scoring 3.44. The university demonstrates a generally positive, albeit varied, performance across these key indicators.
With strong performance in teaching quality and student engagement, this institution garners high marks for its professors (4.2) and student life (4). Location and perceived value also stand out with respectable scores of 3.8. However, areas requiring attention include facilities and accommodation, both rated at 3, indicating potential for improvement in these fundamental aspects of the student experience.
Overall, this institution presents a commendable profile, with its strongest areas being Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Value also scores highly at 4. However, its weakest area lies in Internationality, scoring a modest 2, indicating room for improvement in global engagement. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 189 reviews, ~99.5% are positive. Students highlight good academic levels and personal/professional development. One negative review noted limited laboratory support and outdated equipment.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.23/5 from 30 reviews, students praise a solid curriculum and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers. Approximately 0% of feedback expressed negative sentiment, with minor notes on hostels and campus locations.
All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.
With a 3.89 average rating from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students highlight academic quality and a supportive environment, while ~11% note challenges with campus facilities like water and cafeteria food.
With a 4.2/5 average rating, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, entrepreneurship, and supportive professors. A small amount of feedback (~20%) mentions slow administrative processes.
With a 4/5 average rating, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One review highlights strong benefits for informatics, marketing, design, and web development, noting significant skill development in design. No negative feedback was recorded.
The Instituto Tecnologico de Saltillo is a really good option to make your professional studies, some of the professors which the school has are very well prepared and with a lot of knowledge, but I would like the level of English offered to be better because it is kind of deficient.
Nothing to show
Yes the University is good, decent environs, would recommend it to anyone, one of it flaws remains lecture hall clashes and departments accreditation which affected me mostly. The Uni had a public wifi which goes mostly at night for students a good library, though power is not available always at nights for late reading and sorts, even with the fact that the wifi uses light, which would be of benefit to student research and temporary relaxation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It’s a university that treats its students as part of a family. The lecturers are invested in the personal growth and development of the students and their understanding of the course. However, the university is still in development making it under equipped with facilities
Nothing to show