University of Porto - U.Porto vs Polytechnic Institute of Porto - P.Porto vs Porto Business School vs Universidade Católica Portuguesa – Porto vs ISAG European Business School - ISAG
Side-by-side comparison from 123 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and quality education
- +Practical, hands-on learning and internship opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and a vibrant student environment
- +Practical skills and career relevance
- +Accessible and knowledgeable professors
- +Supportive and welcoming community atmosphere
- +Diverse, international community and close-knit environment
- +Strong career support and business network
- +Relevant, cutting-edge academic content
- +Practical, career-focused programs and strong job preparation
- +Supportive, approachable faculty and welcoming community
- +Excellent, well-equipped research facilities and modern infrastructure
- +Supportive professors and international environment
- +Excellent location and modern facilities
- +Engaging student life and activities
- +Accessible and supportive professors
- +Strong career connections and employability
- +Affordable tuition for acquired knowledge
- +Comprehensive business studies programmes with diverse electives.
- +Solid education for future career preparation.
- +Supportive and cooperative teachers.
- -Lack of student engagement and interactive learning.
- -Poor administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived exploitation of international students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Curriculum and teaching quality are often seen as lacking.
- -Repetitive and outdated course content with little professional value.
- -Lack of transparency and clarity in grading and feedback.
- -Poor job market recognition and career opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Limited resources and inadequate support services hinder academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Facilities and resources are often described as outdated or inadequate.
- -Communication and support from instructors and staff are sometimes lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are a recurring concern.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frustrating.
Overall, the university receives favorable ratings across multiple aspects. Student life and location stand out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.2. Facilities and value also performed well, with ratings over 4.0. Accommodation, however, emerged as the weakest area, receiving the lowest score. Internationality and professors' ratings fall in the middle range, indicating solid but less exceptional performance.
This institution receives excellent marks for its teaching staff, with Professors rated a strong 4.4. Student Life and Value also score highly at 3.9. Facilities and Internationality are well-regarded at 3.8, closely followed by Accomodation at 3.7. The lowest score is for Location, at 3.33, indicating this is the area with the most room for improvement.
Across key metrics, this institution garners impressive evaluations. Location stands out as its strongest asset, achieving a near-perfect score. Among the weakest, accommodation received the lowest rating, though still indicating a positive reception. Other areas like facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value all demonstrate strong performance, reflecting a well-rounded university experience.
Overall, this institution receives positive marks across key aspects of the student experience. Its strongest area is **Value**, boasting a score of 4.65. **Professors** also garnered excellent feedback at 4.54. The **Accomodation** rating, however, stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 3.79. Other areas like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Internationality also received commendations in the mid-4 range.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Facilities, Professors, and Internationality all receiving a strong rating of 4. Value is also highly regarded at 4. Conversely, Location and Student Life are rated at 3 and 3.67 respectively, indicating these are areas with potential for improvement. Accommodations also score a 3.67.
With excellent marks in location and student life, this university shines brightly in those areas. Professors, accommodation, and internationality also received strong scores. The value proposition is particularly appealing, with a rating well above average. The weakest area, though still respectable, is facilities, which scored lower than other aspects.
With a mixed profile, this institution excels in areas like **professors**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving solid ratings. Conversely, its **facilities**, **student life**, and **accommodation** are identified as weaker points, each marked with the lowest scores. The overall **value** sits in the middle, indicating a balanced but not exceptional experience in that regard.
With a 4.02 average rating, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic reputation, research, and a stimulating environment. A small ~2% of feedback mentions issues with limited debate and class structure.
With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~80% of reviews are highly positive. Students praise practical skills, accessible and knowledgeable professors, and a supportive atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.
The ~100% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international atmosphere, diverse student body, and career opportunities. Students found the experience transformative and enriching.
Approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting good career preparation, practice-oriented courses, supportive professors, and modern facilities. Two negative reviews expressed disappointment with course content value and exam transparency.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, student reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~67% positive, ~0% negative). Students praised the school's location and international environment.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, all feedback is positive, highlighting accessible and amazing professors, helpful teachers, and valuable connections to the professional world. This ~100% positive sentiment reflects strong satisfaction with academic support and career opportunities.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. The business studies program is praised for its broad subject coverage and elective options, preparing students well for future careers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
State of the art education in a relaxed and futurist environment. A great place to acquire new skills or just expand your network. Porto Business School will ask you the right questions at the right time. You'll find the answers by yourself by making change happen in the most natural and efficient way.
Sound an Image is one of the 3 programmes from the School of the Arts. It is also, in my experience, the most neglected. This came in the form of less equipment available (priority given to the Cinema course), abysmal workshop conditions (very little space, missing or broken equipment) and not even a designated space where the Year 3 students could storage their Final Project material (I had to constantly fix or rebuild some of my materials). The curriculum itself is very good. Sound an Image is not a full on technical course, and the theoretical classes do help in developing an artistic sensibility and vision - the professors are also, for the most part, engaged and helpful. Lastly, we may have the poorest Student Association in Porto - low budget and little freedom. It's important to note that the programme has changed a lot along the years, recently going through changes on a yearly basis. Allegedly, upcoming students will have better conditions and equipment, as well as more practical projects. Closing remarks: in all honesty, I wouldn't go here without at least a half scholarship. I do not feel the full tuition matches the value of the course. However, Católica is more than a single programme. There's a lot of talks with speakers from different areas, from artists to cientists and other professional backgrounds. There's a psychology service with different workshops. There's a weekly cinema session organized by the Cinema students. There's all these extracurricular things that do bring their value to the school.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
