ESIC Business & Marketing School vs IEM Business School vs INEDE Business School vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Universitat de València
Side-by-side comparison from 258 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical learning, real-world projects, and industry connections.
- +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors.
- +Supportive campus environment and strong academic/personal guidance.
- +Engaging and effective teaching methods.
- +Personalized learning through small class sizes.
- +Valuable networking opportunities and community.
- +Diverse teaching staff and practical venue visits
- +International exchange opportunities
- +Modern teaching methods and well-equipped facilities
- +Strong focus on practical learning and career opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and enriching academic environment
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Practical, career-focused learning and helpful professors
- +Enjoyable student life and positive campus atmosphere
- +Practical work experience and career preparation
- +Supportive and passionate faculty
- +Enriching international environment and social connections
- +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
- +Effective teaching methods and practical application
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication regarding academic systems.
- -Lack of orientation and support for international students.
- -Misleading information about course delivery methods.
- -Insufficient class level and quality.
- -Poor facility quality.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
- -Students express frustration with administrative inefficiencies and poor communication.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or not adequately preparing them for future careers.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful staff.
- -Lack of teacher engagement and support.
- -Financial policies and material costs.
- -Ineffective teaching staff and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor management of resources and limited access to practical facilities.
- -Bureaucratic and administrative issues hinder the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and poor course structure frustrate students.
- -Misleading program length and content
- -Poor organization and administrative issues
- -Invalid certificates and waste of money
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** represent areas that received comparatively lower scores. Other aspects like professors, location, and student life fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.
Based on the provided ratings, the university demonstrates a consistent performance across all surveyed areas, with no exceptional strengths or weaknesses identified. Each category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, received a rating of zero, indicating a uniform absence of positive or negative feedback in these aspects.
University performance reveals a consistent theme with zero ratings across all surveyed aspects: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This uniform score indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses stand out. The institution's offering appears undifferentiated across these crucial university experience components.
This university garners high marks for its internationality, achieving a rating of 4.49. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.21, closely followed by facilities at 4.23 and student life at 4.04. Conversely, accommodation and value received lower scores, at 3.79 and 3.72 respectively, while location sits at 3.98.
An analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive student experience. The strongest areas are Location and Student Life, both exceeding 4.1. Professors also received a perfect score of 4. Facilities stand out as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.87. Other categories like Accomodation, Internationality, and Value also performed well, falling within the 3.9 to 4.1 range.
Across surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, boasting an impressive rating of 4.67. Equally strong are **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both scoring 4.63. **Value** and **Professors** also receive favorable marks around 4.53. The area with the lowest rating is **Location**, at 3.95, indicating it's the primary point for potential improvement. **Accomodation** is rated moderately at 4.11.
This institution's strengths lie in its **Location**, scoring a notable 3.79, and its **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** (3.6) and **Value** (3.33). Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest marks at 3.14, with **Facilities** and **Student Life** also in the lower range (both 3.21).
With 4.13 stars from 55 reviews, ~85% of students praise the collaborative learning, practical projects with real companies, and good teaching quality. One review found the university experience poor.
University reviews are largely positive (~74% 4-5 stars) praising personalized attention, enjoyable teaching, and small class sizes. One review (~17%) found the course level too basic.
The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5 stars. It highlights the good quality of teachers and mentions opportunities like visiting sports venues and an exchange program in Paris. No negative feedback was received.
Most reviews are positive (~96%), highlighting modern teaching methods, practical learning, and job opportunities. A small minority of feedback (~4%) mentions indifferent teachers and material costs.
With ~74% positive reviews, students highlight an international environment, practical learning, and career-focused opportunities. A small percentage of feedback (~2%) mentions occasional organizational confusion and cost.
With a 4.44/5 average, 24 out of 25 reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent faculty, good facilities, and valuable real-world work experiences. No negative feedback was reported.
Around 67% of reviews are positive, praising the strong knowledge and professionalism gained. However, about 33% are negative, citing concerns about organization, program duration, and communication.
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Professional and with many degrees, masters and postgraduate courses to choose from. Good student atmosphere. Pleasant campuses with gardens and cafeterias. The teachers are open-minded and help the student in whatever is necessary.
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
Ive had so many problems with this school>tehy just care about money , after you get in barcelonna even information they just give it if you pay like 200 euros . than the classes> they say you have the option to study online or Presencial but the presential the techer is on her house so it is also online. you dont get any presencial class. aldo if the teacher is in the school she is the same person as the receptionist, the cordiator and director of the course. Classes were poorly organized, with minimal academic content*( if you had any kind of study about the theme you know they dont say anything) and a strong lack of structure. Many subjects were rushed or skipped, and there was little to no real academic guidance.
