ESIC Business & Marketing School vs IE University vs Escuela International de Gerencia - EIG vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs University of Deusto - Deusto Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 483 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, real-world projects and learning
- +Experienced, professional professors with industry insights
- +Collaborative and supportive learning environment
- +Practical application of theory and real-world projects
- +Experienced professors with industry insights
- +International environment and networking opportunities
- +Outstanding faculty support and engaging teaching.
- +Excellent facilities and resources for learning.
- +Guidance and opportunities for future career development.
- +Supportive, approachable professors and staff
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Flexible study options
- +Supportive and helpful teaching/tutoring team
- +High academic quality and practical projects
- +Welcoming community and positive student experience
- +Solid academics and engaging professors
- +Vibrant city life and affordability
- +Positive student-teacher relationships and community
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Disrespectful and unhelpful staff, particularly regarding international student coordination.
- -Misleading information about teaching methods and the overall student experience.
- -Marketing claims do not align with the actual educational experience and quality.
- -Program management and administrative processes are inefficient and inflexible.
- -The campus environment is overly corporate and lacks traditional college experiences.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and administrative support cause frustration.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum.
- -Poor English proficiency of professors and lack of organization.
- -Lack of support and care for Erasmus students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring concern.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Poor teaching quality and outdated curriculum
- -Disorganized and student-unfriendly academic processes
Nothing to show
This institution receives its highest marks for its Facilities and Location, both scoring 4.08. Student Life and Internationality are rated at a respectable 3.75. Areas receiving slightly lower scores include Accomodation and Value, both at 3.67, and Professors, at 3.92.
Internationality stands out as the university's strongest suit, boasting an impressive rating. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories like location, student life, and professors also scored well, demonstrating a generally positive overall profile.
Academic strengths significantly outshine other aspects, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality represent areas with lower scores. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately well, while Location and Value fall within a similar mid-range.
Overall, the university receives positive evaluations across various aspects. Professors are notably well-regarded, followed closely by excellent Facilities. In contrast, Accomodation and Internationality received the lowest scores, while Student Life and Value also fell in the mid-range. Location scored moderately.
This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas. Its location, professors, and value are particularly strong, all receiving ratings above 4.36. Student life and facilities also score well, with averages around 4.2. The university's internationality is rated at nearly 4. The weakest area, however, is accommodation, which stands at a considerably lower 3.32.
Student feedback indicates a university with exceptional strengths in **Student Life** (4.625) and **Location** (4.425). Areas for improvement, while still moderately rated, include **Facilities** (3.55) and **Professors** (3.575). The university also scores well in **Internationality** (4.25) and **Accomodation** (3.92), with a solid rating for **Value** (3.875).
Nothing to show
With a 4.14 average rating from 56 reviews, ~86% of students praise the practice-oriented approach and real-world projects. Professors are often industry professionals sharing practical experience. A single negative review questioned student support and hybrid system claims.
The university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback (~85%), with students highlighting practical projects, experienced professors, and an international environment. A small percentage (~3%) cite issues like academic standards and misleading marketing.
With a 4.07 average rating from 15 reviews, students praise the university's excellent facilities, engaging lecturers, and diverse program offerings. All feedback was positive, with no negative reviews received.
With a 4.06 average, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent infrastructure, approachable staff, and a practical learning approach. A small percentage (~4%) noted low professor English levels and disorganization.
~100% of 54 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.31/5. Students highlight quality materials, responsive help, and feeling supported throughout their learning.
About 53% of reviews are positive, praising solid academics, professors, and the enriching city experience. Around 15% are negative, citing disorganization, administrative issues, and poor staff empathy. The average rating is 3.44/5.
Nothing to show
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The DBS MBA is a master's degree for people who really want to learn a lot in a relatively short time, to do so they use a very dynamic and fast-paced work methodology, and in my opinion very useful and effective. In addition, teamwork is encouraged almost at all times, values that are highly valued if you come from more autonomous training such as engineering. The more purely theoretical training is also combined with real cases of entrepreneurship or experiences of successful people with high experience in the business world. Without a doubt, quality-price, I think it is the best master's degree you can opt for. Of course, being part of the Deusto Business School will greatly facilitate your access to the world of work, as well as a great networking network.
The academic content of the master has been very interesting to me and I think I have learned a lot. Coordination I think it can improve since in the subjects taught by more than one teacher I have identified a lack of coherence. In relation to the practices, several problems have arisen since, when working with the juvenile protection or penal system, on several occasions it has taken more than the appropriate period to accept the practices. Also the list of centers that were offered last year, at which point I had to choose, this year they were not offered. However, the content of the master seems very good to me.
Nothing to show
