Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv vs Kyiv International University - KyIU vs National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine vs National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM

Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv: wins 0/3 categories
Kyiv International University - KyIU: wins 0/3 categories
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine: wins 1/3 categories
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy: wins 0/3 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 1/3 categories
Kyiv National Linguistic University: wins 1/3 categories
Bogomolets National Medical University - NMU: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Biology and Wildlife
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.78
5.00
4.00
4.30
5.00
4.00
2.00
Location
4.11
5.00
Not rated
4.50
4.50
5.00
4.33
Professors
3.89
5.00
5.00
3.70
4.33
4.50
2.33
Internationality
3.67
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.67
5.00
Win
2.67
Student life
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.60
4.67
4.50
3.33
Value
4.33
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.67
4.50
3.67
Accommodation
3.33
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.67
Win
4.00
2.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teaching and encouraging professors
  • +Diverse opportunities and engaging student life
  • +Strong academic reputation and well-organized programs
  • +Excellent and supportive teachers
  • +High-level organization and clear information
  • +Interesting and well-structured classes
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment
  • +Positive learning atmosphere
  • +Well-maintained campus
  • +High academic standards and international focus
  • +Opportunities for practical learning and creativity
  • +Strong reputation and European standards
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation
  • +Engaging and effective learning methods
  • +Strong focus on business and language programmes
  • +Expert instructors and engaging teaching methods.
  • +Relevant and practical curriculum with up-to-date content.
  • +Supportive learning environment and strong career services.
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unfair assessment practices.
  • -Dissatisfaction with the university system and overall experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful support staff are a recurring complaint.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
  • -Excessive workload and focus on written assignments over practical skills.
  • -Ineffective and demanding remote learning practices.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution scores exceptionally well for **Value**, its highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Student Life** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.

This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and location. Student life and internationality are also strong, both receiving a solid 4 out of 5. However, the university's accommodation offerings present a significant weakness, with a rating of 0. Overall, the value is rated positively at 4, indicating a generally well-regarded experience despite the accommodation issue.

This institution shines brightly in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and student life, along with excellent value. Facilities and accommodation also receive strong marks. A notable weakness, however, is its location, which received a zero rating. Internationality is also rated well, indicating a globally aware environment.

This institution excels particularly in areas like Student Life (4.6), Location (4.5), and Facilities (4.3), indicating a vibrant and well-situated campus environment. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas, Value stands out with a perfect 5, suggesting a strong return on investment. Professor ratings are a moderate 3.7.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

The university scores exceptionally well in several key areas. Its location and internationality are rated a perfect 5, suggesting a vibrant and global environment. Professors and student life also receive high marks at 4.5, indicating a strong academic and social experience. Facilities and accommodation are solid at 4, representing good, though not outstanding, resources. Overall, the university presents a very positive profile.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing in its location, which received the highest rating. Conversely, its facilities are the weakest point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Student life and value also received favorable marks, while professors, accommodation, and internationality fall in the middle range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic traditions and supportive teachers. A small percentage of feedback notes dissatisfaction with the system or specific instructors.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, student reviews highlight excellent teachers and high-level organization. Positive comments also mention clear information and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights its welcoming atmosphere, neat campus, and calming environment conducive to learning.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise educational quality, practical lessons, encouraged critical thinking, and opportunities for creativity.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight strong learning support and effective coursework, particularly in business and language studies.

With an average rating of 2/5, two out of three reviews are negative (~67%). Students report excessive assignments and a focus on online tasks over practical learning.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
100%
50%
67%
50%
0%
4★
31%
0%
0%
50%
33%
50%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
2★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Typical Post-Soviet medical university

A certain hierarchy reigns in the university in which professors and the dean’s office are considered gods, and students and laboratory assistants are secondary characters. Despite this, there are people that ready to teach and help you I consider the opportunity to become more independent as a plus in NMU. Many faculties and campuses can also be attributed to the merits of university. The complexity of learning unites students so that you can turn a blind eye to shortcomings…

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close