Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv vs Kyiv International University - KyIU vs National Pedagogical Dragomanov University vs National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv: wins 0/5 categories
Kyiv International University - KyIU: wins 1/5 categories
National Pedagogical Dragomanov University: wins 0/5 categories
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine: wins 2/5 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 2/5 categories
National University of Food Technologies - NUFT: wins 0/5 categories
GoIT Neoversity: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Biology and Wildlife
Best programme: MBA
Kiev, Ukraine
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.78
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.11
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.89
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.67
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.33
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teaching and encouraging professors
  • +Diverse opportunities and engaging student life
  • +Strong academic reputation and well-organized programs
  • +Excellent and supportive teachers
  • +High-level organization and clear information
  • +Interesting and well-structured classes
  • +Positive atmosphere and friendly teachers
  • +Beautiful and quiet campus
  • +Supportive and manageable academic environment
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment
  • +Positive learning atmosphere
  • +Well-maintained campus
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unfair assessment practices.
  • -Dissatisfaction with the university system and overall experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution scores exceptionally well for **Value**, its highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Student Life** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.

This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and location. Student life and internationality are also strong, both receiving a solid 4 out of 5. However, the university's accommodation offerings present a significant weakness, with a rating of 0. Overall, the value is rated positively at 4, indicating a generally well-regarded experience despite the accommodation issue.

This university exhibits a uniformly unimpressive profile, with zero ratings across all evaluated aspects. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as either strong or weak. The institution scores equally low in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value, suggesting a pervasive need for improvement in all these domains.

This institution shines brightly in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and student life, along with excellent value. Facilities and accommodation also receive strong marks. A notable weakness, however, is its location, which received a zero rating. Internationality is also rated well, indicating a globally aware environment.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic traditions and supportive teachers. A small percentage of feedback notes dissatisfaction with the system or specific instructors.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, student reviews highlight excellent teachers and high-level organization. Positive comments also mention clear information and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is described as beautiful, quiet, and having a fine atmosphere. Students found exams easy, teachers lighthearted, and facilities bright.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights its welcoming atmosphere, neat campus, and calming environment conducive to learning.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
100%
100%
67%
0%
0%
4★
31%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close