Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv vs Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University vs Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law vs National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine vs National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy

Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine (5.00)
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv: wins 0/5 categories
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University: wins 0/5 categories
Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law: wins 0/5 categories
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine: wins 2/5 categories
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy: wins 0/5 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 3/5 categories
National University of Food Technologies - NUFT: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Biology and Wildlife
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: MBA
Category ratings
Facilities
3.78
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.30
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.11
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Professors
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.70
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.60
4.67
Not rated
Value
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.67
Not rated
Accommodation
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teaching and encouraging professors
  • +Diverse opportunities and engaging student life
  • +Strong academic reputation and well-organized programs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment
  • +Positive learning atmosphere
  • +Well-maintained campus
  • +High academic standards and international focus
  • +Opportunities for practical learning and creativity
  • +Strong reputation and European standards
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unfair assessment practices.
  • -Dissatisfaction with the university system and overall experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful support staff are a recurring complaint.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution scores exceptionally well for **Value**, its highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Student Life** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution shines brightly in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and student life, along with excellent value. Facilities and accommodation also receive strong marks. A notable weakness, however, is its location, which received a zero rating. Internationality is also rated well, indicating a globally aware environment.

This institution excels particularly in areas like Student Life (4.6), Location (4.5), and Facilities (4.3), indicating a vibrant and well-situated campus environment. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas, Value stands out with a perfect 5, suggesting a strong return on investment. Professor ratings are a moderate 3.7.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic traditions and supportive teachers. A small percentage of feedback notes dissatisfaction with the system or specific instructors.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights its welcoming atmosphere, neat campus, and calming environment conducive to learning.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise educational quality, practical lessons, encouraged critical thinking, and opportunities for creativity.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
100%
50%
67%
0%
4★
31%
0%
0%
0%
50%
33%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close