Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv vs National Pedagogical Dragomanov University vs Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University vs Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law vs National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv: wins 0/7 categories
National Pedagogical Dragomanov University: wins 0/7 categories
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University: wins 0/7 categories
Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine: wins 3/7 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 4/7 categories
National University of Food Technologies - NUFT: wins 0/7 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
3.78
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.11
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Professors
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
Value
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.67
Not rated
Accommodation
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teaching and encouraging professors
  • +Diverse opportunities and engaging student life
  • +Strong academic reputation and well-organized programs
  • +Positive atmosphere and friendly teachers
  • +Beautiful and quiet campus
  • +Supportive and manageable academic environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment
  • +Positive learning atmosphere
  • +Well-maintained campus
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unfair assessment practices.
  • -Dissatisfaction with the university system and overall experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution scores exceptionally well for **Value**, its highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Student Life** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.

This university exhibits a uniformly unimpressive profile, with zero ratings across all evaluated aspects. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as either strong or weak. The institution scores equally low in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value, suggesting a pervasive need for improvement in all these domains.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution shines brightly in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and student life, along with excellent value. Facilities and accommodation also receive strong marks. A notable weakness, however, is its location, which received a zero rating. Internationality is also rated well, indicating a globally aware environment.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic traditions and supportive teachers. A small percentage of feedback notes dissatisfaction with the system or specific instructors.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is described as beautiful, quiet, and having a fine atmosphere. Students found exams easy, teachers lighthearted, and facilities bright.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights its welcoming atmosphere, neat campus, and calming environment conducive to learning.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
0%
0%
100%
67%
0%
4★
31%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close