Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv vs National Pedagogical Dragomanov University vs Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman vs National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine vs National Technical University of Ukraine Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute - NTUU KPI

This institution scores exceptionally well for **Value**, its highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Student Life** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.

This university exhibits a uniformly unimpressive profile, with zero ratings across all evaluated aspects. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as either strong or weak. The institution scores equally low in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value, suggesting a pervasive need for improvement in all these domains.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Location** and **Professors** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.

This institution shines brightly in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and student life, along with excellent value. Facilities and accommodation also receive strong marks. A notable weakness, however, is its location, which received a zero rating. Internationality is also rated well, indicating a globally aware environment.

Analysis of this university's ratings reveals strengths in its **Location (4.5)**, standing out significantly. Conversely, the weakest areas appear to be **Professors (2)** and **Accomodation (2.5)**, both receiving considerably lower scores. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately at 3, while Internationality and Value fall within the lower-average range.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing in its location, which received the highest rating. Conversely, its facilities are the weakest point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Student life and value also received favorable marks, while professors, accommodation, and internationality fall in the middle range.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic traditions and supportive teachers. A small percentage of feedback notes dissatisfaction with the system or specific instructors.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is described as beautiful, quiet, and having a fine atmosphere. Students found exams easy, teachers lighthearted, and facilities bright.

With an average rating of 3.25/5, feedback is split evenly between positive and negative. Students praised good staff and interesting programs, while others cited corruption and unengaging teaching.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights its welcoming atmosphere, neat campus, and calming environment conducive to learning.

With an average rating of 3.33/5, approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a cool community, useful experience, and strong technical foundation. Some negative feedback (33.3%) mentions areas for improvement such as building repairs and heating issues.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 2/5, two out of three reviews are negative (~67%). Students report excessive assignments and a focus on online tasks over practical learning.