University of Karachi vs Karachi Institute of Economics and Technology - PAF KIET vs Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine vs University of Okara vs BENAZIR BHUTTO SHAHEED UNIVERSITY LYARI

Side-by-side comparison from 57 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Dawood University of Engineering And Technology (4.50)
University of Karachi: wins 3/7 categories
Karachi Institute of Economics and Technology - PAF KIET: wins 1/7 categories
Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine: wins 0/7 categories
University of Okara: wins 0/7 categories
BENAZIR BHUTTO SHAHEED UNIVERSITY LYARI: wins 0/7 categories
Dawood University of Engineering And Technology: wins 3/7 categories
Jinnah University for Women - JUW: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Karachi, Pakistan
4.20
Read more reviews
50 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Computer Science
Karachi, Pakistan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Architecture and Urban Planning
Category ratings
Facilities
3.18
3.40
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Win
Not rated
Location
4.28
3.40
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.16
4.20
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Internationality
3.66
Win
3.40
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.04
3.20
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Value
4.04
Win
3.20
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.31
Win
2.60
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Academic value and degree recognition
  • +Reasonable fees and accessibility
  • +Supportive professors and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Practical and skill-building curriculum
  • +Vibrant campus activities and growth opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on design studios and project guidance
  • +Focus on research and thesis innovation
  • +Strong facilitation and support systems

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and poor teaching quality from incompetent professors.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of essential facilities like WiFi and clean washrooms.
  • -Absence of a supportive research environment and lack of academic accountability.
  • -Outdated facilities and declining academic quality.
  • -Poor administrative management and focus on profit.
  • -Negative impact on student life and teacher engagement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and support from the institution are prevalent concerns.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in **Location** and **Professors**, both receiving scores above 4.2. **Student Life** and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance, each averaging over 4.0. Conversely, **Facilities** emerges as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.18, and **Accomodation** also scores relatively lower at 3.31. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 3.66.

Assessing the university reveals a varied performance across key metrics. Professors received the highest rating at 4.2, indicating a significant strength in academic instruction. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the weakest area, scoring a low 2.6. Facilities, location, student life, internationality, and value all clustered around a moderate 3.2-3.4 range, suggesting these aspects are adequate but could benefit from improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university excels in areas like location and student life, both scoring a high 4.5. Value for money is also well-regarded at 4. Facilities and professors receive a solid average rating of 3.5. Internationality sits at a moderate 3. The weakest aspect by a significant margin is accommodation, with a low score of 1.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic value and low costs. A small ~6% express dissatisfaction with administrative inefficiency and outdated facilities.

Three out of five reviews are positive, highlighting transformative experiences, supportive faculty, and skill development. One review is negative, citing concerns about financial motives and teacher quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Key highlights include unique design studios and effective management for student facilitation and research. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
4★
32%
60%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
12%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
KU review

I'm liking the university I'm currently enrolled just one thing I'm a bit skeptical about is always the limited exposure and opportunities regarding the degree. Apart from this, the curricula and the faculty is experienced and exceptional in their work.

Paf kiet university the hub of IT Students

Paf kiet university Karachi is one of the best universities for computer science programs and also in aeronautical engineering. The most I liked in this university is its faculty. Its faculty is experienced and friendly too. And the thing I dislike is that it's too expensive for middle-class students. I recommend this university because it's also pretty well in all activities like sports, festivals, Gaming and programming competitions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close