Vincent Pol University - VPU vs Lublin University of Technology vs University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin - WSEI vs University of Life Sciences in Lublin - UP Lublin vs University College of Enterprise and Administration in Lublin - WSPA
Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Welcoming and supportive academic environment with approachable and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Diverse and international student body with accessible English-taught programs.
- +Practical learning opportunities and personalized attention in engaging discussions.
- +Exceptional professors and engaging academic programs
- +Strong practical preparation with excellent facilities and resources
- +Vibrant campus life with clubs and extracurricular activities
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers and staff
- +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world application
- +Welcoming and friendly university environment
- +Strong emphasis on practical skills alongside theoretical knowledge.
- +Professional, supportive, and approachable lecturers.
- +Well-organized campus with good accommodation and a friendly atmosphere.
- +High-quality, relevant, and engaging academic programs.
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff.
- +Strong sense of community and positive campus atmosphere.
- +Welcoming international community and student atmosphere
- +High-quality education and knowledgeable professors
- +Convenient campus location and affordable city living
Nothing to show
- -Inconsistent curriculum and poor lecturer English proficiency hinder learning.
- -Difficulty in receiving promised refunds and poor communication from administration.
- -Lack of preparation for future careers due to teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of practical application and real-world relevance in curriculum
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of clear communication
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring problems.
- -Lack of professor engagement and academic support.
- -Uninspiring and unremarkable university environment.
- -Unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and disorganization are prevalent concerns.
Nothing to show
The university garners solid marks across most areas, with Location standing out as a significant strength. Internationality and Professors also received favorable reviews. Conversely, Accomodation was rated the weakest, suggesting room for improvement in that specific aspect. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value received moderate scores.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **location**, which received an outstanding 4.6. **Student life** also scores highly at 4.4. Areas like **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation** are well-regarded, all sitting at 4.2 or above. The university's **value for money** appears to be its most moderate area, with a rating of 3.8, suggesting room for improvement in this category.
This university garners impressive scores in several key areas, with **Location** being its strongest asset at 4.67 and **Facilities** also highly rated at 4.57. **Student Life** and **Professors** also received positive marks. However, **Accomodation** presents a significant challenge, with a considerably lower rating of 2.83, indicating this is the weakest aspect according to the provided data. **Internationality** and **Value** fall within a solid middle range.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **Location**, which achieved a perfect score. **Accommodations** and **Facilities** also stood out with very high ratings. Areas receiving solid, though slightly lower, scores include **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated at 4.375. Performance in **Professors** and **Internationality** was rated at 4.25, representing the weakest, yet still strong, aspects of the university experience.
Regarding university ratings, the strongest area is undeniably **Location**, scoring a remarkable 4.33. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Professors** represent the weakest points, both receiving lower scores of 2.33. Other areas like Student Life and Value received moderate scores around 3, while Accommodation and Internationality fall in the mid-range.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location**, receiving a near-perfect score. Facilities and student life also stand out with high ratings. **Professors**, however, represent the area with the lowest score among those surveyed. Accommodation and internationality received moderate scores, while value for money was also rated positively.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable lecturers, a welcoming and diverse environment, and good learning standards. A smaller portion of feedback (~12%) mentions issues with curriculum adherence, financial transparency, and lecturer communication.
With a 3.8/5 average, reviews highlight strong academic programs, knowledgeable professors, and good facilities. Around 0% of feedback is negative, with no specific recurring issues mentioned.
Students largely praise the university's welcoming environment and approachable, supportive lecturers, with a strong emphasis on practical application. Minor feedback suggests potential areas for improvement in sports facilities and clarification of explanations.
Reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), highlighting a high standard of teaching with ample practical experience and knowledge. Students also appreciate the diversity of courses, extracurriculars, and supportive atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.
With only 3 reviews, the average rating is 2.67/5. Approximately 33.3% of feedback is negative, citing a lack of professor engagement and support. No positive reviews were provided.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~86% of reviews are positive. Students highlight the welcoming student atmosphere, international program, and helpful professors. Minor administrative process delays were mentioned.
Nothing to show
I want to share our experience about studying at VPU. I hope this review will help somebody not to make a mistake. My daughter studied there from October 2023 to May 2024 – Beauty Science faculty, in English. She decided not to continue her studies at the University due to a number of reasons: 1. The curriculum is not followed. The semester classes indicated in it did not coincide with those taught in the daughter’s group. 2. Classes according to the plan were supposed to begin on October 9, 2023, the 1st lesson was held only on October 16. Only 3 classes per week were held from the 16th to the end of October. There were no classes at all during the first week of November. 3. We were promised that all classes specified in the program would be carried out in full. But actually, teachers were regularly late for classes and finished the classes ahead of schedule. The 3 or 4 hours stated in the schedule lasted 1.5 or 2 hours. 4. The medical examination for students wasn’t carried out in full, although practical classes with cosmetology procedures and manipulations were conducted. 5. The University offers only 1 educational institution under the Erasmus program for the Beauty science faculty. My daughter independently found and contacted a number of universities with similar programs. Five of them agreed to accept her under the Erasmus program, but this required entering into partnership agreements. She provided information to the Erasmus program coordinator at Vincent Pol University with contacts and correspondence. But even then, no agreement has been concluded with any of the universities. 6. Not a single experiment was carried out during practical classes in the subjects of perfumery and biochemistry, since there were no reagents. 7. Even though the University considers itself as practically oriented it’s not true. The beauty salons in Lublin don’t want to recruit students for practice. The University offers 2 salons which are ready to recruit students but it turns out that they just sign the documents to confirm the completion of the practice and don’t teach students anything. 8. The administration of the University promises to resolve the problems. But nothing changes. To sum up: the University is not interested in its students’ knowledge. If you just wish to buy a diploma – it’s the right place. If you are interested in getting knowledge, skills and experience – NOT.
Nothing to show
WSEI is a really friendly place to be, the staff are approachable and helpful. My unique experiences were learning about how to care for the sick in ways that I never knew existed such as making the patients feel comfortable and treating them like family since I am studying nursing. It made me feel more passionate and look forward to all my lectures.
Interesting place. If you are interested in "nature-related" studies, that shouldn't be a bad choice. I am from veterinary medicine and everything there is average: average teachers, average program, average methods. Of course, there are some motivated teachers, who will try to give you the most of them but is better to keep your expectations not too high. If you are highly motivated to "dig deep" it should be easier for you. Besides that, there is a very good student exchange program (Erasmus) so you can travel easily with a pretty good scholarship. Same if you want to come there as an Erasmus, you shouldn't be disappointed. Good location in the city center, the city is relatively cheap by itself which is great for students.
Nothing to show
I like the fact that the program is very international new things are learned every day. The course is like I expected with new information about the course every day. I would highly recommend this university to close friends and family members.
Nothing to show
