Riga Technical University - RTU vs ITCA Fepade vs National Technical University of Ukraine Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute - NTUU KPI vs Radford University vs University of New South Wales
Side-by-side comparison from 75 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong technical and engineering focus with practical application
- +Professional and understandable professors and staff
- +Modern facilities and well-organized, clear teaching approach
- +Engaging and innovative teaching methods
- +Feeling productive and proactive during studies
- +Strong technical foundation and useful experience
- +Cool community and interesting social life
- +Intense but manageable workload
- +Strong faculty support and inspirational teaching
- +Abundant opportunities for involvement and practical experience
- +Welcoming and diverse campus atmosphere
- +Industry-connected teaching and real-world experience
- +High-quality, engaging professors and innovative facilities
- +Well-structured, rewarding academic programs and campus life
- +Flexible pacing and self-directed learning
- +Prompt grading and efficient administrative process
- +Excellent professors and strong academic programs.
- +Supportive student community and emphasis on practical application.
- +Rigorous environment fostering professional development and leadership skills.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Lack of helpfulness from staff and professors
- -Frequent rent increases for university dorms
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a concern.
- -Teaching quality and course relevance are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management indifference to student well-being.
- -Outdated facilities and ongoing maintenance problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is often unclear or insufficient.
- -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and management issues.
- -There are complaints about outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Students find the curriculum irrelevant and teaching methods ineffective.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of course relevance frustrate students.
This university garners excellent marks in several key areas, with Location receiving the highest rating. Professors, Student Life, and Internationality also score strongly. Conversely, Accommodations present the weakest area, receiving a notably lower score than other aspects. Facilities and Value are rated mid-range, indicating good but not exceptional performance in those categories.
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores, indicating a highly satisfactory experience in these domains. The weakest area identified is location, which received a moderate rating of 3, suggesting it may be a less defining strength compared to the other overwhelmingly positive aspects.
Analysis of this university's ratings reveals strengths in its **Location (4.5)**, standing out significantly. Conversely, the weakest areas appear to be **Professors (2)** and **Accomodation (2.5)**, both receiving considerably lower scores. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately at 3, while Internationality and Value fall within the lower-average range.
Overall, this institution receives positive evaluations across several aspects. Professors are notably well-regarded, signifying a key strength. Student life and internationality also score well, indicating a vibrant and global community. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area in the ratings, suggesting room for improvement in that domain. Location and value for money are rated moderately, reflecting a generally satisfactory experience.
Presenting a comprehensive overview, this institution excels in the quality of its **Professors**, earning a high rating of 4.56. **Facilities** also score well at 4.42 and **Student Life** at 4.36. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score at 3.92, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other categories like Location, Internationality, and Value are rated solidly in the mid-4s.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving top marks for its professors, location, internationality, and overall value. These aspects appear to be the university's strongest selling points. Conversely, significant room for improvement exists in facilities, student life, and accommodation, all of which received the lowest possible score.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in **Value**, receiving a rating of 4.82, and **Facilities**, scoring 4.7. Student life and accommodation also rank highly at 4.64 and 4.67 respectively. The university's **Internationality** stands out as its weakest area, with a rating of 4.18, though all other aspects of the student experience are positively reviewed.
With a 4.07 average rating, ~82% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting strong engineering and technical programs with practical learning and modern facilities. A small percentage of feedback notes administrative delays and unhelpful staff.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, around 100%. Students appreciate modern teaching methods, finding them productive and engaging. There are no reported negative reviews.
With an average rating of 3.33/5, approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a cool community, useful experience, and strong technical foundation. Some negative feedback (33.3%) mentions areas for improvement such as building repairs and heating issues.
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the welcoming, diverse atmosphere, quality academic programs with supportive faculty, and ample campus involvement opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.
With a ~100% positive sentiment, students highlight excellent teaching quality and industry connections. They praise the learning tools and facilities, contributing to a rewarding overall experience.
With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars, indicating overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole reviewer highlighted the benefit of self-paced learning for their Bachelor of Science Psychology Degree.
All 11 reviews are positive (100%), with students praising academic excellence, professors' passion and patience, and strong student camaraderie. The challenging environment fosters professional development and leadership skills.
My opinion of RTU is good. There is definitely a lot of room for improvement with the organization and the overall work completed with the staff. The university offers a good environment with diversity and an inviting campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The UNSW is a great university, as an International student I would like to express the experience I had when Studying there. There are many international students who studied there, various students around the world are getting their degrees at UNSW. I like the experience as a students we met some experience people that is dealing with real life experience working in certain industry, they shared us some real life situation and how to handle those. I'd recommend students to study there as UNSW is one of the top university across Australia.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
