Arab International University - AIU vs Tampere University - TUNI vs Deakin University vs Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University vs İstanbul Medeniyet University

Side-by-side comparison from 81 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tampere University - TUNI (4.30)
Arab International University - AIU: wins 0/7 categories
Tampere University - TUNI: wins 3/7 categories
Deakin University: wins 4/7 categories
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University: wins 0/7 categories
İstanbul Medeniyet University: wins 0/7 categories
International University for Science and Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Modelo: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
30 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Melbourne, Australia
4.20
Read more reviews
49 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Law and Security
Mérida, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.57
Win
4.52
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.90
4.39
Win
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.17
4.38
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
4.03
4.25
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.73
Win
4.07
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.20
4.23
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
4.10
Win
3.93
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and research focus
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
  • +Vibrant student community and campus life
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Practical learning and real-world experience
  • +Diverse and inclusive campus community
  • +High academic standards and reputation
  • +Strong sense of community and belonging

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Concerns about teaching quality and university reforms.
  • -Terrible support and IT issues are prevalent.
  • -Unethical behavior and a lack of care for students are concerning.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful teaching staff cause student distress.
  • -Limited program offerings and lack of practical experiences like field trips and internships.
  • -Inconsistent teacher quality and outdated facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

The university garners impressive scores across multiple facets, with Student Life and Facilities emerging as standout strengths, achieving ratings of 4.73 and 4.57 respectively. Professors and Value also received positive marks above 4.0. Location, however, is its weakest area, scoring 3.9, though accommodations and internationality remain solid at over 4.0.

Considering the provided ratings, the university excels in its **Facilities**, earning a score of 4.52. **Professors** and **Location** also receive strong marks at 4.38 and 4.37 respectively. Areas that could see improvement include **Accomodation**, which is rated lowest at 3.93, and **Student Life** at 4.07. The university demonstrates a solid overall performance with good scores in **Internationality** (4.25) and **Value** (4.23).

The institution demonstrates strong performance in its teaching quality, with professors receiving a high rating of 4. Value for money is also a positive aspect, similarly scoring 4. However, the university's weakest areas lie in its facilities and student life, both rated at 3. Location and accommodation offer a middle ground at 3.5, while internationality also sits at a respectable 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5, approximately 96.7% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic environment, research focus, and facilities. A small percentage (~3.3%) of negative feedback notes a decline in teaching quality due to university reforms.

With a 4.24 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of students praise modern facilities, supportive faculty, and valuable internships/programs. A small ~6% of feedback noted issues with support, IT, and ethical concerns.

Reviews are split evenly between positive and negative feedback. One student praises the university's high standards, while another cites low teacher potential and a lack of field trips and internships.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
53%
43%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
30%
51%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close