Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Universidad del Magdalena - Unimagdalena vs Roskilde University - RUC vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA

Side-by-side comparison from 55 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: The Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities (5.00)
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad del Magdalena - Unimagdalena: wins 5/7 categories
Roskilde University - RUC: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
The Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities: wins 1/7 categories
I-Fatoss University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Germanic Languages
Lagos, Nigeria
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.60
4.96
Win
4.50
4.50
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.92
4.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.67
4.81
5.00
Win
4.63
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Internationality
4.67
4.85
Win
4.75
3.88
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Student life
4.20
4.76
Win
4.50
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Value
4.17
4.92
Win
4.75
4.63
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.68
Win
3.50
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Innovative and inclusive environment
  • +High academic level and qualified faculty
  • +Comprehensive professional and educational advancement
  • +Project-based learning with real-life problems
  • +Supportive and helpful teachers
  • +International and diverse student atmosphere
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment

Nothing to show

  • +Inspiring professors and strong academic foundation
  • +Wide range of well-structured study programmes
  • +Dynamic and multilingual learning environment

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Frustrating administrative & management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspiring teaching.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and a lack of clear communication cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Facilities and resources are often described as outdated or lacking.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring theme.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

This university garners exceptionally high marks across the board. Its strongest areas are Facilities, boasting a near-perfect score of 4.96, closely followed by Location and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.92. Student Life is also well-regarded. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 4.68.

A generally positive assessment emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in areas like **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring an impressive 4.75. **Professors** also receive a perfect score of 5. The primary area for improvement lies with **Accomodation**, which is rated a comparatively lower 3.5, though still within a good range. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also strong points, rated 4.5.

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

Nothing to show

This university garners impressive marks across multiple aspects. Its location stands out with a perfect score, while facilities, professors, student life, and value all received consistently high ratings. Accommodations and internationality, though still strong, represent areas with slightly lower, yet still favorable, scores compared to the peak performance indicators.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

With 26 positive reviews and zero negative, ~100% of feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight high academic levels, inclusive and innovative environments, excellent facilities, and strong faculty.

With a ~70% positive sentiment, students praise project-based learning, supportive teachers, and the international atmosphere. Some mention a need for independence and time management. No negative reviews were recorded.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5 from 3 reviews, sentiment is entirely positive (~100%). Recurring positive themes include knowledgeable lecturers, good curriculum structure, and a dynamic learning environment. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
86%
85%
50%
56%
0%
100%
0%
4★
14%
15%
20%
44%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close