Emerson College vs Hult International Business School vs Northeastern University vs Simmons University vs University of Massachusetts Boston - UMass Boston
Side-by-side comparison from 150 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant collaborative opportunities and academic depth
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Strong focus on creative industries and media production
- +Strong career services and networking opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with experienced faculty
- +Diverse international environment and global alumni network
- +Strong co-op and experiential learning
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Vibrant community and location
- +Passionate and supportive faculty
- +Nurturing environment for academic and personal growth
- +Supportive staff and diverse student body
- +Career guidance and internship opportunities
- +Diverse student body and welcoming community
- +High-quality and affordable education
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative & management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods is also a recurring theme.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Facility quality and professor standards are inconsistent.
- -Admission standards are perceived as too low.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and course structure leads to confusion.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a common complaint.
- -Students express frustration with administrative and management inefficiencies.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration.
- -Overcrowded classes and limited access to resources.
- -Subpar facilities and equipment that need updating.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates robust strengths, notably in its prime location and international appeal, both receiving high marks. Facilities and professors are also well-regarded, indicating a solid academic and physical environment. Areas for potential improvement include student life, accommodation, and overall value, which, while still satisfactory, scored lower than other metrics.
This university garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality** (4.77) and **Location** (4.58). Professors also receive high marks at 4.47. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, indicating a potential area for improvement.
With a stellar 4.72, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Facilities and student life also receive high marks, both exceeding 4.5. Accommodation, rated at 4.2, represents the lowest-scoring area, though it remains a solid rating. Professors, internationality, and value all fall within a respectable mid-to-high 4 range, indicating a well-rounded performance.
This university garners excellent marks for its **location** (4.5) and **facilities** and **professors** (both 4.4), suggesting a well-resourced and academically strong environment. Areas for potential improvement include **accommodation** (3.67) and **internationality** (3.6), which received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Student life also presents a moderate rating at 3.8, while value for money is rated positively at 4.2.
This institution garners high marks across multiple facets. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, achieving a near-perfect score. Facilities and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a positive physical environment. While student life and professors also receive good scores, these represent the areas where improvement could be most impactful, though all aspects are generally well-regarded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The vast majority of reviews are positive (~75%), highlighting ample opportunities for collaboration and creative endeavors, particularly in media programs. Professors are generally described as qualified and helpful.
Approximately 95.4% of 65 reviews are positive, highlighting networking, job opportunities, practical learning, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with staff competence and course materials.
All 48 reviews are positive, averaging 4.46/5. Students highlight experiential learning, particularly the co-op program, and academic excellence. A vibrant Boston location and supportive faculty are also frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4.6/5, Simmons University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise exceptional faculty, a supportive environment, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. No negative reviews were recorded.
All 28 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.11/5. Students praise helpful advisors, career guidance, internship opportunities, and affordable, high-quality education in a diverse and welcoming environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show