Islamic University of Indonesia - UII vs Ahmad Dahlan University - UAD vs University of Sanata Dharma vs STIKes Madani vs Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir
Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, well-maintained facilities and up-to-date learning resources
- +Inspiring and cooperative lecturers with comfortable classrooms
- +Supportive Islamic environment promoting harmony and tolerance
- +Excellent academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
- +Supportive and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.
- +Strong Islamic religious curriculum alongside formal education.
Nothing to show
- +Islamic integration with healthcare courses
- +Quranic memorization and Arabic language requirements
- +Strong academic programs in nuclear technology
- +Student-friendly environment in Yogyakarta
- +Excellent laboratory facilities
- +Engaging curriculum with practical applications
- +Diverse extracurriculars and organizations
- +Supportive academic environment
Nothing to show
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of clear communication and organization.
- -Students are frustrated by administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -There is widespread dissatisfaction with outdated facilities and a lack of resources.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a consistent concern.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is frustrating for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts learning.
Nothing to show
This university garners excellent ratings across key aspects. Facilities stand out as the strongest area, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors, student life, and perceived value are also highly regarded. Location, accommodation, and internationality are consistently rated well, though slightly lower than the top-performing categories. Overall, the institution presents a very positive and well-rounded profile.
An institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, professors, and international appeal, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Student life and location also score well at 4.25. However, the university's value proposition registers as a comparative weakness, with a rating of 3.5, while accommodation sits at a respectable 4.
Nothing to show
This institution receives excellent marks for its professors and overall value, both earning a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also strong, each rated at a solid four. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating, coming in at a three. This indicates a generally positive experience with notable strengths in teaching quality and affordability.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution shines particularly brightly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks. Student life and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a positive campus environment. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which received moderate scores. The overall value proposition appears strong.
An excellent overall profile emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** and **Value** are also exceptionally strong areas, marked by high marks. In contrast, **Facilities** is the weakest aspect, though still rated positively. **Professors** and **Accomodation** also demonstrate very solid performance.
Nothing to show
All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students frequently praise the excellent facilities, including journal access and technology resources. Lecturers are described as kind, fun, cooperative, and inspiring.
With 100% positive reviews, students report transformative experiences and strong academic/personal growth. They highlight enjoyable studies, effective teaching, and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is 4/5. Positive feedback (100%) highlights programs that integrate Islamic learning with academic courses like midwifery, nursing, and pharmacy, including mandatory Quran memorization and Arabic language.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university garners high praise for its student-friendly environment and strong academic programs. Positive comments highlight excellent laboratory facilities and specialized nuclear-related education.
Students report an enriching and pleasant experience, highlighting strong academic programs and numerous extracurricular opportunities. The supportive environment and diverse studies are frequently praised, with minimal mention of less-than-ideal facilities.
Nothing to show
Being a student at UII seems to be a matter of prestige because the tuition fees are quite expensive. However, the supporting facilities and teaching materials make the word "price" completely irrelevant. Supporting facilities such as international journals, free accounts to access Microsoft Offices, Spotify, computer lab space and WiFi with fairly fast speeds are provided. Teaching materials are always of international standard with case studies that increase knowledge at every class meeting. It's not just about learning activities, but facilities to support student creativity such as a podcast room, filming equipment, content studio, and editing software are also provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show