Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP vs Universidade de São Paulo - USP vs Faculty of Technology and Administration Paulista - FIAP vs International School of Management vs Ironhack
Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic foundation and knowledge transfer
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academics and expert professors
- +Valuable networking opportunities with diverse peers
- +Excellent campus facilities and student support
- +Excellent professors and engaging courses
- +High quality programming education
- +Recognized as a top university
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Excellent courses and valuable learning.
- +Helpful and supportive staff.
- +Positive overall experience leading to repeat enrollment.
Nothing to show
- -Pervasive and overwhelming activism, particularly a strong left bias, stifles unbiased learning.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Ineffective teaching and unengaging course content.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency create dissatisfaction.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient instructor support.
- -Lack of updated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and bureaucratic administrative issues.
Nothing to show
This institution shows a mixed performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.25. In contrast, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 2.67. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life are moderate at 3, while Internationality also falls below average at 2.75. The overall **Value** is rated a respectable 3.25.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in student life, internationality, and value, all receiving top marks. Location also scores well. However, the accommodation facilities represent the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Facilities and professor quality are rated solidly in the mid-range.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This suggests a consistent lack of perceived strength in areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. With no areas standing out as particularly positive or negative, the university presents a uniform performance across all surveyed categories.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Exceptional performance is evident across several key areas for this institution. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all received a perfect score, indicating a highly satisfactory experience in these aspects. The university's value proposition is also rated at the highest level. However, its internationality stands out as a weaker area, receiving a moderate rating of 3, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement or diversity.
Nothing to show
University reviews show approximately 74% positive feedback, praising knowledgeable professors and a supportive environment. However, about 16.7% of reviews mention concerns like activism affecting learning.
93% of reviews are positive, highlighting beneficial networking, great personal and professional opportunities, and amazing professors. A small amount of feedback noted some campi's infrastructure doesn't match others.
The sole reviewer rated FIAP 5/5 stars, highlighting excellent professors, students, and courses. This single positive review indicates a very favorable student experience, with no negative feedback reported.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students highlight excellent courses, valuable learning experiences, and exceptional support. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I truly love the University of São Paulo. It’s not only the best university in Latin America, but also one of the most respected institutions in the world. What makes USP so special to me is its massive research infrastructure. The academic environment encourages curiosity, and for students who stand out, there are countless opportunities — whether in research, internships, or academic exchange. What I admire most is how knowledge is taken seriously here. Professors are highly qualified, and you’re constantly surrounded by brilliant minds. It’s a challenging space, but it pushes you to grow. However, if there’s something I think could be improved, it’s the way the institute’s funding is managed. In many cases, the needs of undergraduate students are not the top priority. It often feels like the investment is directed elsewhere, rather than towards improving the daily life and academic support for those who are just starting their journey in higher education. Still, despite its flaws, I would definitely recommend USP. It’s a place that shapes people — not only academically, but personally. If you’re willing to engage and take advantage of everything it offers, USP will open doors you never imagined.
Nothing to show
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
