Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP vs State College of Technology - FATEC vs Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas - FMU vs International School of Management vs Ironhack
Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic foundation and knowledge transfer
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +Caring, genius professors
- +High quality education
- +High quality faculty and excellent teaching
- +Convenient location and safety
- +Scholarship and alumni discount programs
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Pervasive and overwhelming activism, particularly a strong left bias, stifles unbiased learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of practical learning opportunities and rescheduled experiences.
- -Insufficient or outdated facilities impacting the educational experience.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution shows a mixed performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.25. In contrast, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 2.67. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life are moderate at 3, while Internationality also falls below average at 2.75. The overall **Value** is rated a respectable 3.25.
This institution boasts an impressive score for its professors, location, and international student experience, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and facilities are also strong with 4-star ratings. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3 stars. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, with particular strengths in academic quality and its global appeal.
This institution garners solid scores in several key aspects. Its location is a standout strength, while facilities and professors also receive favorable ratings. Student life and value for money are areas with room for improvement. Accommodation and internationality are the weakest points, suggesting opportunities for enhancement in these domains.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews show approximately 74% positive feedback, praising knowledgeable professors and a supportive environment. However, about 16.7% of reviews mention concerns like activism affecting learning.
With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise good professors who care about them and their exceptional knowledge. There are no negative reviews.
University feedback is mixed, with a ~25% of reviews expressing dissatisfaction. Positive feedback highlights respected faculty and good facilities, while negative comments focus on a lack of rescheduled lab classes and field trips.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show