Gadjah Mada University - UGM vs STIKes Madani vs Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University - UMY vs Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU vs Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta

Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Gadjah Mada University - UGM: wins 0/1 categories
STIKes Madani: wins 0/1 categories
Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University - UMY: wins 1/1 categories
Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU: wins 0/1 categories
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta: wins 0/1 categories
Yogyakarta State University - UNY: wins 0/1 categories
University of Amikom Yogyakarta - AMIKOM: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4.60
Read more reviews
30 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc Psychology
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Midwifery
Best programme: Information and Communication Systems Engineering
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.30
4.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.59
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.57
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.17
3.00
5.00
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Not rated
Student life
4.50
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.63
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.20
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and faculty support
  • +Vibrant student community and campus culture
  • +Commitment to people's values and social responsibility
  • +Islamic integration with healthcare courses
  • +Quranic memorization and Arabic language requirements
  • +Practical curriculum and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Collaborative environment and modern facilities
  • +Valuable career services support

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging curriculum with practical applications
  • +Diverse extracurriculars and organizations
  • +Supportive academic environment
  • +Practical, relevant curriculum
  • +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Focus on in-demand professional skills

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Unengaging teaching methods and a perceived lack of relevance in coursework are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a consistent concern.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is frustrating for students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of necessary resources and support is a significant drawback.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners strong marks across most categories, with **Location** and **Value** standing out as particular strengths at 4.59 and 4.63 respectively. **Professors** also receive high praise. The weakest area appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.17, though this still represents a solid score. Facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a generally positive student experience.

This institution receives excellent marks for its professors and overall value, both earning a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also strong, each rated at a solid four. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating, coming in at a three. This indicates a generally positive experience with notable strengths in teaching quality and affordability.

Exceptional marks were awarded across all evaluated aspects. The university achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a uniformly outstanding experience with no specific areas requiring improvement or standing out as significantly stronger than others.

Nothing to show

An excellent overall profile emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** and **Value** are also exceptionally strong areas, marked by high marks. In contrast, **Facilities** is the weakest aspect, though still rated positively. **Professors** and **Accomodation** also demonstrate very solid performance.

This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across the majority of surveyed categories, excelling particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. The sole area requiring significant attention is Accomodation, which received a zero rating, indicating a substantial deficiency in this aspect.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, praising the university's strong academic reputation, excellent faculty, vibrant community, and social responsibility. No negative feedback was provided.

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. Positive feedback (100%) highlights programs that integrate Islamic learning with academic courses like midwifery, nursing, and pharmacy, including mandatory Quran memorization and Arabic language.

With a single review, the student experience is rated a perfect 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive feedback. This suggests a highly satisfactory educational environment.

Nothing to show

Students report an enriching and pleasant experience, highlighting strong academic programs and numerous extracurricular opportunities. The supportive environment and diverse studies are frequently praised, with minimal mention of less-than-ideal facilities.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a well-structured curriculum and experienced lecturers offering practical, relevant learning. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
70%
0%
100%
0%
33%
100%
0%
4★
23%
100%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close