Gadjah Mada University - UGM vs Ahmad Dahlan University - UAD vs Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir vs Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University - UMY vs Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta

Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Gadjah Mada University - UGM: wins 0/0 categories
Ahmad Dahlan University - UAD: wins 0/0 categories
Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir: wins 0/0 categories
Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University - UMY: wins 0/0 categories
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta: wins 0/0 categories
University of Amikom Yogyakarta - AMIKOM: wins 0/0 categories
SMKN 6 Yogyakarta: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4.60
Read more reviews
30 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc Psychology
Best programme: Bachelor of Management
Best programme: Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Information and Communication Systems Engineering
Best programme: International Relations
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism
Category ratings
Facilities
4.30
4.50
3.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.59
4.25
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.57
4.50
5.00
5.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.17
4.50
3.00
5.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Student life
4.50
4.25
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.63
3.50
4.00
5.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
4.20
4.00
4.00
5.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and faculty support
  • +Vibrant student community and campus culture
  • +Commitment to people's values and social responsibility
  • +Excellent academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
  • +Supportive and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.
  • +Strong Islamic religious curriculum alongside formal education.
  • +Strong academic programs in nuclear technology
  • +Student-friendly environment in Yogyakarta
  • +Excellent laboratory facilities
  • +Practical curriculum and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Collaborative environment and modern facilities
  • +Valuable career services support
  • +Engaging curriculum with practical applications
  • +Diverse extracurriculars and organizations
  • +Supportive academic environment

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on practical learning
  • +Supportive and helpful teachers
  • +Good facilities and resources
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Unengaging teaching methods and a perceived lack of relevance in coursework are disliked.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -There is widespread dissatisfaction with outdated facilities and a lack of resources.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of necessary resources and support is a significant drawback.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners strong marks across most categories, with **Location** and **Value** standing out as particular strengths at 4.59 and 4.63 respectively. **Professors** also receive high praise. The weakest area appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.17, though this still represents a solid score. Facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a generally positive student experience.

An institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, professors, and international appeal, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Student life and location also score well at 4.25. However, the university's value proposition registers as a comparative weakness, with a rating of 3.5, while accommodation sits at a respectable 4.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution shines particularly brightly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks. Student life and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a positive campus environment. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which received moderate scores. The overall value proposition appears strong.

Exceptional marks were awarded across all evaluated aspects. The university achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a uniformly outstanding experience with no specific areas requiring improvement or standing out as significantly stronger than others.

An excellent overall profile emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** and **Value** are also exceptionally strong areas, marked by high marks. In contrast, **Facilities** is the weakest aspect, though still rated positively. **Professors** and **Accomodation** also demonstrate very solid performance.

Nothing to show

This institution receives perfect scores across all evaluated metrics. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas; every aspect surveyed meets the highest possible standard.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, praising the university's strong academic reputation, excellent faculty, vibrant community, and social responsibility. No negative feedback was provided.

With 100% positive reviews, students report transformative experiences and strong academic/personal growth. They highlight enjoyable studies, effective teaching, and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university garners high praise for its student-friendly environment and strong academic programs. Positive comments highlight excellent laboratory facilities and specialized nuclear-related education.

With a single review, the student experience is rated a perfect 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive feedback. This suggests a highly satisfactory educational environment.

Students report an enriching and pleasant experience, highlighting strong academic programs and numerous extracurricular opportunities. The supportive environment and diverse studies are frequently praised, with minimal mention of less-than-ideal facilities.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It highlights extensive learning, enjoyable hands-on practice, and helpful, nice teachers.

Rating distribution
5★
70%
25%
100%
100%
33%
0%
100%
4★
23%
75%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close