Swiss School of Management - SSM vs The British University in Egypt vs Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University vs October University for Modern Sciences and Arts vs Higher Institute Of Tourism And Hotels

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 5/6 categories
The British University in Egypt: wins 0/6 categories
Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University: wins 0/6 categories
October University for Modern Sciences and Arts: wins 1/6 categories
Higher Institute Of Tourism And Hotels: wins 0/6 categories
Canadian International College - CIC: wins 0/6 categories
El Sewedy University of Technology - SUTech: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Arts
Best programme: Bio-Pharmaceutical Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
Win
4.63
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
5.00
Win
4.36
2.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.33
3.94
3.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.94
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.33
4.33
3.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
5.00
Win
4.31
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.13
2.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Expert, supportive professors and rigorous, challenging academics
  • +High-quality campus facilities and learning resources
  • +Vibrant campus life, social activities, and diverse student body
  • +N/A (No positive themes in the provided review)
  • +Outstanding professors and hands-on learning
  • +Rigorous and comprehensive pharmacy program
  • +Supportive faculty and practical skill development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Unhelpful professors and poor social engagement were major disappointments.
  • -Limited and exclusive extracurriculars restricted student participation.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are a recurring problem.
  • -Limited resources and inadequate support hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This university garners excellent marks for its facilities, achieving a high score of 4.63. Student life and value also stand out with strong ratings around 4.33 and 4.31 respectively. Accommodation is well-regarded at 4.13. However, the university's professors and internationality received the lowest ratings, both scoring 3.94. The location also scored a respectable 4.36.

A mixed bag of ratings emerges for this university. Its strongest points are its **Facilities**, scoring a commendable 4, and a solid **Professors** rating of 3. However, significant weaknesses are evident in **Internationality** (1), **Location** (2), and **Accomodation** (2), suggesting areas requiring considerable improvement. Student Life and Value both received moderate scores of 3.

Overall, this institution receives strong evaluations, particularly in **Professors**, which stands out with a high rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also score well, indicating solid strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area. **Location** and **Student Life** are rated moderately, suggesting room for improvement alongside the positive aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

Nearly all feedback (approximately 94%) is positive, highlighting rigorous academics, expert professors, and good facilities. A small amount of criticism (~6%) notes limited social life and occasional administrative responsiveness issues.

With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive feedback, reviews highlight the university's large campus size. Some mention administrative delays as a minor drawback.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are largely positive, highlighting outstanding professors and rigorous, comprehensive programs that effectively blend theory with practical skills. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
44%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
44%
100%
33%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
6%
0%
33%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close