Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs University College Lahore vs Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs Faryal Dental College - FDC vs National College of Business Administration and Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 1/5 categories
University College Lahore: wins 1/5 categories
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 1/5 categories
Faryal Dental College - FDC: wins 1/5 categories
National College of Business Administration and Economics: wins 0/5 categories
Rashid Latif Medical College: wins 0/5 categories
University of Education Lahore: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Dentistry
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Education in Educational Leadership
Category ratings
Facilities
4.44
4.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Location
4.50
Win
3.50
2.50
3.00
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
3.60
4.50
5.00
Win
3.00
2.67
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.58
3.50
5.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.17
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
3.33
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.76
4.00
3.00
2.00
2.67
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Critical thinking and intellectual freedom
  • +Rigorous academics and competitive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programmes
  • +Quality education and diverse programmes
  • +Supportive environment and extracurriculars
  • +Adequate resources for specific fields
  • +Excellent reputation and program variety
  • +Strong accounting, law, engineering, and computer science offerings
  • +Engaging and fun learning environment
  • +Supportive faculty and peers
  • +Strong professional relationships
  • +Expert faculty & outcome-based education
  • +Engaging professors & strong class participation
  • +Cooperative administration & good infrastructure

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive teaching and academic focus
  • +Improvement in punctuality and information flow
  • +Resolution of student issues
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor student-teacher communication and lack of career counseling.
  • -Limited co-curricular activities and a general lack of student engagement opportunities.
  • -Unhelpful faculty members, with very few exceptions.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum or teaching quality is a recurring point of dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

With impressive scores in several areas, this institution excels particularly in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving marks above 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the areas needing the most improvement, with ratings of 3.76 and 3.6 respectively. **Professors** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided data.

Performance across various university aspects reveals a strong academic focus, with professors receiving the highest rating of 5. Facilities and accommodation are well-regarded, both scoring 4, complemented by an excellent internationality score of 4.5. Value for money also stands out with a rating of 4.5. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are location and student life, each rated at 3.5.

This institution excels in student life and internationality, both scoring a perfect 5. Professors also received strong marks with a 4. Conversely, the location is identified as a weaker area, receiving a 2.5. Facilities and accommodation are rated moderately at 3, while value for money is also a positive aspect with a 4.

This institution receives its highest marks in Value (5), indicating strong satisfaction with the return on investment. Student Life and Professors also score well with a 4. Areas needing improvement are Accomodation, rated lowest at 2, and Facilities and Internationality, both at 3. The overall picture suggests a university that offers good academic and extracurricular experiences but faces challenges in housing and physical resources.

This university shows a mixed performance in its ratings. Its strongest areas are Professors and Location, both scoring an average of 3.67. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality are its weakest points, each receiving a score of 2.67. Facilities and Student Life also averaged a moderate 3, while Value sits slightly above average at 3.33.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in **Student Life** with a perfect score. Facilities also stand out at an impressive 4.5. Conversely, while still strong, Professors, Location, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value all hover around a solid 4. This suggests a vibrant student experience and excellent resources, with other aspects performing reliably well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (91%) student reviews praise LUMS for its transformative education, critical thinking encouragement, and supportive faculty. Students value the demanding academics and diverse campus community, finding the experience rewarding despite challenges. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the university is highly praised. Reviews highlight quality education, diverse degree options, and various extracurricular activities. Engineering students specifically note adequate lab equipment and qualified faculty.

The sole review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It praises the university as one of the best in Pakistan, highlighting its diverse program offerings in fields like accounting, law, engineering, and computer science.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This feedback highlights amazing faculty, a great environment, and encouraging peers, contributing to a fun and bonding experience.

Around 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting good faculty, infrastructure, and an engaging learning environment. Approximately 33% of feedback mentioned unhelpful faculty and a lack of career counseling and co-curricular activities.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight effective teaching and a supportive environment.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
50%
100%
100%
33%
0%
50%
4★
31%
50%
0%
0%
33%
0%
50%
3★
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close