London School of Commerce - LSC vs American International University Bangladesh vs The University of Asia Pacific vs Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University - SAU vs European University of Bangladesh

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: The University of Asia Pacific (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/4 categories
American International University Bangladesh: wins 1/4 categories
The University of Asia Pacific: wins 1/4 categories
Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University - SAU: wins 2/4 categories
European University of Bangladesh: wins 0/4 categories
Manarat International University: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Best programme: Veterinary Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
4.29
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.75
3.69
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
4.07
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
3.93
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.75
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.75
4.14
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
3.23
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Excellent academic programs and teaching quality
  • +Strong focus on practical application and real-world skills
  • +Supportive faculty and engaging campus environment
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Well-designed and engaging curriculum
  • +Positive and meaningful overall experience
  • +Specialized agricultural and veterinary programs.
  • +Strong academic foundation and research opportunities.
  • +Renowned as Bangladesh's oldest agricultural institution.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication is consistently poor.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a commendable overall performance. Its **facilities** stand out with a high rating of 4.25, closely followed by **professors** (4.2) and **value** (4.15). **Student life** also scores well at 4.0. The **accommodation**, however, presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.11, indicating room for improvement in this category.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both achieving a perfect score of 5. Areas such as **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** are all rated solidly at 4, indicating a consistently positive experience. The university's **Value** also receives a respectable score of 4, rounding out its generally strong performance.

This institution garners significant praise, particularly excelling in its prime **location** and vibrant **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. Offering excellent **value** also stands out. While generally strong, the **facilities**, **professors**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are rated slightly lower at a commendable four out of five, indicating solid but not perfect performance in these areas.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

With an average rating of 4.3/5 and ~0% negative feedback from 20 reviews, students highlight a rewarding academic experience with experienced faculty and practical learning. Positive themes include modern facilities and a multicultural atmosphere.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights a positive and meaningful experience. This feedback emphasizes a well-planned program and experienced, supportive faculty.

This university receives excellent feedback, with 100% positive reviews. Students highlight its status as an old agricultural institution and its four faculties offering various degrees. The average rating is 4/5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
36%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close