London School of Commerce - LSC vs Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University vs American International University Bangladesh vs Stamford University Bangladesh vs International University of Business Agriculture and Technology - IUBAT

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/1 categories
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University: wins 0/1 categories
American International University Bangladesh: wins 0/1 categories
Stamford University Bangladesh: wins 1/1 categories
International University of Business Agriculture and Technology - IUBAT: wins 0/1 categories
Military Institute of Science and Technology: wins 0/1 categories
Canadian University of Bangladesh: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: BBA Human Resource Management
Best programme: Bachelor in Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Aeronautical Engineering
Best programme: Marine Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
4.36
5.00
5.00
4.00
5.00
Location
4.75
Not rated
3.82
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
3.25
Not rated
4.18
5.00
4.00
3.00
5.00
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
3.91
5.00
Win
4.50
3.00
3.00
Student life
3.75
Not rated
3.91
5.00
5.00
4.00
5.00
Value
2.75
Not rated
4.18
5.00
4.50
3.00
5.00
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
3.10
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Strong business and engineering programs
  • +Practical, real-world application focus
  • +Supportive faculty and engaging environment
  • +High academic quality and skilled graduates
  • +Qualified and experienced faculty
  • +Vibrant student environment
  • +Pioneering, visionary institution
  • +Commitment to producing professional graduates
  • +strong academics and excellent labs
  • +well-structured curriculum for theory and practice
  • +no session jams, timely graduation
  • +Practical and theoretical teaching methods
  • +Friendly faculty and supportive environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Unsupportive and ineffective teaching staff.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are significant concerns.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and uninspired course content are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are significant problems.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized as inadequate.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Assessments reveal that this institution excels in its facilities, earning a strong 4.36. Professors and value also received commendable scores of 4.18. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, with a rating of 3.1, and location, noted at 3.82. Student life and internationality are rated similarly around 3.91.

Exceptional evaluations were received across all assessed areas. Strengths are evident in every aspect, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No weak areas were identified, indicating a consistently high standard in all surveyed categories.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. **Student Life** also received a top rating of 5. The university demonstrates a strong commitment to **Internationality** and offers good **Value**, both rated at 4.5. Its **Professors** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded, each earning a 4, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.

This institution excels in its **location** and **accommodation**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities** and **student life** also score well, indicating a supportive and well-equipped campus environment. However, **professors**, **internationality**, and **value** received average ratings, suggesting potential areas for development compared to its other strengths.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly in its facilities, professors, location, and student life, all receiving perfect scores. Its value for money is also highly rated at 5. Accommodation scores a commendable 4. The university's internationality, however, stands out as its weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~82% of feedback). Students praise practical learning and a strong academic foundation. No negative feedback was provided.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights academic quality and a vibrant student environment. No negative feedback was reported.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the university's pioneering role and its founding vision. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4/5 from one review, the Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST) is praised for its strong academic environment and excellent lab facilities. Students appreciate the well-structured curriculum and the absence of session jams, allowing for timely graduation.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's practical and theoretical teaching methods. The educational faculty and environment are also highlighted as friendly and supportive.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
64%
100%
100%
0%
100%
4★
25%
0%
18%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close