IUT De Sceaux vs University for the Creative Arts - UCA vs Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University vs University of Uyo - UNIUYO vs San Martin National University - UNSAM
Side-by-side comparison from 176 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Relevant practical experience and industry-connected faculty
- +High-quality educational system overall
- +Strong recommendation to others
- +Strong creative and innovative focus
- +Abundant specialized equipment and resources
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Strong company engagement and placement opportunities
- +Active campus life with diverse events and celebrations
- +Conducive and safe learning environment
- +High-quality teaching and supportive lecturers
- +Excellent educational and extracurricular experiences
- +Modern campus and well-equipped facilities
- +High-quality, progressive academic programs and updated curriculum
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
- +Inclusive and supportive learning environment.
- +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers.
- +Well-structured academic programs.
- +Supportive learning environment and committed, approachable lecturers.
- +Peaceful, focused academic atmosphere.
- +Strong sense of community and close relationships.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching quality can be disappointing.
- -Poor teaching quality and unprofessionalism from staff.
- -Frequent technical difficulties and unreliable class scheduling.
- -Lack of student focus and engagement from the university.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum is a concern.
- -Administrative issues and lecturer inflexibility cause stress and academic failure.
- -Insufficient and overcrowded facilities hinder practical learning and student comfort.
- -Frequent academic strikes disrupt the learning process.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
- -Lack of clear academic support and guidance leaves students feeling lost.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support from faculty and staff are consistently problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -A lack of resources and support is a common complaint.
Overall, this institution garners a strong performance with an average rating of 3.8. Student life shines brightest, achieving an impressive 4.2, closely followed by facilities and value, both scoring a solid 4. Conversely, accommodation presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving a rating of 3. Location also falls slightly below the average at 3.2.
This university demonstrates a notable strength in its **Facilities**, receiving a high rating of 4.11. **Professors** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Opportunities for **Student Life** and the **Location** present areas for improvement, both scoring below 3.5. **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, suggesting a solid but not exceptional performance in these aspects.
This institution receives excellent marks for its **location**, a clear standout. Professors and student life are also strong points, both earning a solid 4 out of 5. The university's facilities and accommodation, however, are areas for potential improvement, as they were rated a 3. Internationality also received a moderate rating of 3, while value for money is considered good at 4.
Among the evaluated aspects of the university, location stands out as its strongest attribute, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation and internationality are areas where the institution appears to have the most room for improvement, scoring lowest. Other categories like professors, student life, and value received solid, mid-range scores, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance.
An assessment of the university reveals a highly international environment, with a near-perfect score for Internationality. Professors, Student Life, and Value also received excellent ratings. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Facilities are rated well, but not exceptionally.
Student feedback indicates a robust university experience, particularly excelling in **Student Life**, which received the highest rating. The **Value** of education is also highly regarded. Conversely, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring the lowest. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, Location, and Accommodation fall within a generally positive range.
This institution exhibits a varied rating profile. Accommodation stands out as a particularly strong point, receiving the highest score. Conversely, internationality is the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Other aspects, such as professors, location, student life, and value, fall within a moderate range. Facilities are rated slightly below average.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, reviews are largely positive, highlighting the quality of the system and helpful professors. One review specifically praised the work-study program and recommended the university. No negative feedback was recorded.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising creativity, well-taught courses, supportive environment, and abundant resources. A small ~5% of feedback indicates unprofessionalism and poor teaching.
One review provided suggests a positive experience with ~100% positive sentiment. Companies visit for recruitment, with placement rates around 50%. Events and functions are also held.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a conducive learning environment, good teaching, and safety. A smaller portion, about 8.7%, expresses concerns about stress and inadequate facilities.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the modern campus, well-equipped facilities, updated curriculum, and professional faculty. They also highlight progressive programs, student well-being initiatives, and opportunities for career development.
Over 70% of 15 reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, discipline, and a diverse, supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 3.5/5 from 4 reviews, ~50% are positive, highlighting a quiet, supportive learning environment and committed lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
I found this to be a highly unprofessional university with very little interest in its students and their education. I undertook an MSc here and found the level of teaching to be extremely poor and not on par with the degree level. During my year at the university, I experienced the following: - The majority of lessons started off with technical difficulties that resulted in lessons losing half an hour. - Tutors scheduled classes and then did not show up for them. Tutors were significantly late to lectures and then laughed about it. Tutors took annual leave during term time. - Students were out of control and extremely disruptive, tutors did very little to resolve this issue and on numerous occasions laughed at and therefore encouraging their disruptive behaviour. - I had lessons that were scheduled to be 2 hours long with 45-minute breaks, reducing the lesson time significantly. - I attended lessons where the lecture was pre-recorded and played to us on the screen. I had to go to the university to watch a pre-recorded lesson over zoom. - Lectures were not present at their own classes and took them over zoom, again we had to attend a class to sit and watch a lesson over zoom. In some cases, it took a number of weeks before I saw the tutor physically present in the classroom. - The blended learning ended halfway through the year, and all students were required to attend all lectures in person with no exception. Which would have been fine had it not been extremely contradictory to the fact that half of the lessons were online classes as it was "more convenient” due to classes having 300+ students in with rooms only able to hold around 100. - I witnessed a significant number of students (I would estimate at around 50) being turned away from a class that they were scheduled to attend as the room held fewer students than were enrolled in the class , and the room was already full. I heard them being told they had to go to another room where the lesson was being streamed on a zoom call. I expressed concerns over marking as I felt that some of the feedback given was not in line with the work that was submitted. I felt that none of my queries were taken seriously and as a result of this, I feel that I have come away with less than I worked for. I found that this university often made mistakes regarding the publications of awards. My records were updated with a mark that was significantly lower than the one stated on the work and when receiving my final publication I was being given the wrong degree. I felt as though the requirement for an MSc from this university was extremely low and not on par with what I would expect from a post graduate degree. The national average for a MSc Dissertation is between 15,000 and 20,000 words. The maximum word count for my MSc dissertation was 4000 - this is less that I was required to write for my BA. When I raised my concerns to the university I felt that I was met with a very detached and defensive approach and I was made to feel as though I was at fault. After this interaction, I felt cast aside and treated very differently by staff members. I feel that I have spent in excess of £10,000 to learn absolutely nothing. I am very ashamed to say that I attended this university and plan to keep that fact as hidden as possible. If I could go back I would avoid UCA and attend a faculty that takes education seriously.
Nothing to show
"My campus experience at the University of Uyo was unforgettable. From the moment I stepped into the vibrant campus, I knew I was in for an adventure. The lush greenery and modern architecture created a perfect blend of serenity and innovation. I remember strolling through the campus, surrounded by friends, debating about our latest assignment or sharing laughs. The sound of Afrobeat music drifted from the student union building, beckoning us to join the fun. In the classrooms, our lecturers inspired us with their passion and expertise. We engaged in lively discussions, challenged each other's perspectives, and grew together. Outside of academics, I explored various clubs and societies, discovering hidden talents and making lifelong friends. From cultural festivals to sporting events, the campus was always alive with energy. *Likes:* 1. Academic diversity: Offers various undergraduate and postgraduate programs. 2. Research opportunities: Has research centers and institutes. 3. Campus life: Vibrant student community, sports facilities, and cultural events. 4. Location: Situated in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, with access to cultural and economic hubs. 5. Alumni network: Strong connections with graduates worldwide. *Dislikes 1. Infrastructure challenges: Some facilities may require upgrade or maintenance. 2. Administrative processes: Bureaucratic procedures can be slow. 3. Funding constraints: Limited resources may impact academic programs. 4. Accommodation: Limited on-campus housing options. *Recommendation:* The University of Uyo can be a suitable choice for students seeking: 1. Affordable education 2. Cultural diversity 3. Research opportunities 4. Strong alumni connections *Recommendation rating:* 3.5/5
Nothing to show
Akwa Ibom State University is one of the prestigious institution in Nigeria. The University has shaped thousands of grads into world impacting leaders and mentors in their respective field. It has through through highly intelligent lecturers ascertain the transfer of knowledge meaningfully. But, I must say, there are also some slack to the functionality. The University follows a defined curriculum which every year, same things, same way, same courses were taught in the same classroom. It doesn't give chance to keep track of new discoveries or probably push students to discovering one. Student are more or less pressured to cram and digest when required. There's no avenue to give individual perspective but same thing was given by the lecturers. To the end, if I was the leadership of the University, I would ensure the review of the curriculum give chance to new discoveries and then encourage the students to do something with what they learn even while in school.
Nothing to show