Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Johan Cruyff Institute vs Universitat d'Alacant vs University of Deusto - Deusto Business School vs Universidad Miguel Hernández - UMH
Side-by-side comparison from 194 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Excellent campus environment and facilities
- +Supportive and passionate teaching staff
- +Vibrant student life and city atmosphere
- +Welcoming community and supportive, knowledgeable professors
- +Comprehensive and practical academic programs
- +Enriching personal and global development
- +Strong academic and research support
- +Interdisciplinary and research-oriented programs
- +Modern facilities and collaborative environment
- +Professional, involved instructors and familiar atmosphere.
- +Diverse design degree specializations.
- +Improving organization and future outlook.
Nothing to show
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Teaching quality and academic training are lacking.
- -Outdated facilities and inefficient administration are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and student comfort.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues, including retroactive law application.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities negatively impacting campus life.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities with difficult access.
- -Disappointing academic experience despite qualified teachers.
Nothing to show
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
This institution demonstrates particularly strong performance in Student Life, achieving a rating of 3.95. Internationality and Facilities also received favorable scores. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.27, indicating room for improvement in this category. The remaining aspects, including Professors, Location, and Value, received moderate to good ratings.
This institution shows strong performance in several key areas, with Location and Value both receiving a high rating of 4.37. Professors and Facilities are also well-regarded, scoring 4.26. Student Life, at 4.11, and Internationality, at 3.84, are moderately rated. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, which received a score of 3.26.
This institution demonstrates a commendable overall performance, with its **Facilities** standing out as the highest-rated area. Student Life, Professors, and Internationality also receive strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest aspect of the university's offerings. While Location and Value are rated moderately well, improvements in the accommodation sector could significantly enhance the student experience.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates no specific strengths or weaknesses were identified within facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value for money. The consistent score across every aspect suggests a need for comprehensive review and development across all operational and academic areas.
Nothing to show
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
The vast majority of reviews (~95%) are positive, highlighting the campus and study programs. A small portion of feedback (~5%) points to concerns with teaching quality.
With ~90% positive feedback, students highlight welcoming communities and exceptionally useful, kindly delivered teaching. The average rating is 4.27/5.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~74%) for academic and research support, interdisciplinary programs, and a conducive environment. A small percentage (~4.6%) of reviews mention some limitations in campus facilities.
Two of three reviews are positive, highlighting professional teachers and learning opportunities. One review is negative, citing poor facilities and access, despite mentioning personalized treatment. The average rating is 3/5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
Universitat d'Alacant enhances the energy of its campus community through a diverse selection of extracurricular activities. The university fosters an atmosphere that nurtures creativity and individual development, reflected in its modern facilities and dynamic learning environments. Professors, characterized by their passion and expertise, implement creative teaching approaches.
The DBS MBA is a master's degree for people who really want to learn a lot in a relatively short time, to do so they use a very dynamic and fast-paced work methodology, and in my opinion very useful and effective. In addition, teamwork is encouraged almost at all times, values that are highly valued if you come from more autonomous training such as engineering. The more purely theoretical training is also combined with real cases of entrepreneurship or experiences of successful people with high experience in the business world. Without a doubt, quality-price, I think it is the best master's degree you can opt for. Of course, being part of the Deusto Business School will greatly facilitate your access to the world of work, as well as a great networking network.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
