Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs ESIC Business & Marketing School vs Escuela International de Gerencia - EIG vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH
Side-by-side comparison from 274 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Personalized faculty support and professional development
- +Organized and clear program delivery with helpful staff
- +Excellent academic environment and modern facilities
- +Practical learning, real-world projects, and industry connections.
- +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors.
- +Supportive campus environment and strong academic/personal guidance.
- +Outstanding faculty support and engaging teaching.
- +Excellent facilities and resources for learning.
- +Guidance and opportunities for future career development.
- +Welcoming and social atmosphere for meeting people
- +Comprehensive and complementary academic programmes
- +Practical learning opportunities outside the classroom
- +Real-world work experience and strong career support.
- +Excellent professors and a supportive, modern learning environment.
- +International student community and enriching social connections.
- +Strong academic level and knowledgeable professors
- +Vibrant city, culture, and affordability
- +Positive student-teacher relationships and social atmosphere
Nothing to show
- -Poor management and unprofessional leadership.
- -Incompetent teachers due to unqualified hiring practices.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication regarding academic systems.
- -Lack of orientation and support for international students.
- -Misleading information about course delivery methods.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and administrative support cause frustration.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum.
- -Low English proficiency of some professors and lack of organization.
- -Feeling of disinterest from both students and faculty towards international students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often found to be lacking.
- -Administrative & management issues cause disorganization and lack of student consideration.
- -Poor teaching quality and outdated academic practices are prevalent.
- -Exam scheduling and distribution of holidays are poorly managed.
Nothing to show
This institution receives commendations across several key areas. Accommodation stands out as its strongest point, boasting the highest rating. Other well-regarded aspects include facilities and professors, both scoring an impressive 4.25. While student life, internationality, and value are also positively rated, the location is the weakest area of assessment, though still considered good.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** represent areas that received comparatively lower scores. Other aspects like professors, location, and student life fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.
Academic strengths significantly outshine other aspects, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality represent areas with lower scores. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately well, while Location and Value fall within a similar mid-range.
Overall, this institution receives solid ratings, with professors and facilities being its strongest aspects. Student life and accommodation show areas for improvement, while value and internationality fall within an average range.
An excellent overall performance is indicated by these university ratings. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, boasting a high score of 4.71. Facilities and Professors also received strong marks. The weakest area, by comparison, is **Location**, with a score of 3.87, suggesting this may be a point of consideration.
This institution receives its highest marks for Student Life, with a score of 4.59, closely followed by its Location and Internationality. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are Professors and Facilities, both scoring around 3.64 and 3.65 respectively. Accomodation and Value also show solid, above-average performance.
Nothing to show
With a 4.33/5 average rating from 9 reviews, ~78% of feedback is positive. Students praise personalized professor attention, organization, and support. A small amount of negative feedback noted director and faculty issues.
With 4.13 stars from 55 reviews, ~85% of students praise the collaborative learning, practical projects with real companies, and good teaching quality. One review found the university experience poor.
With a 4.07 average rating from 15 reviews, students praise the university's excellent facilities, engaging lecturers, and diverse program offerings. All feedback was positive, with no negative reviews received.
With ~74% positive reviews, students frequently highlight good experiences and people. However, ~5.4% of feedback mentions low academic rigor and organizational issues.
With an average rating of 4.43/5, ~96% of 23 reviews are positive. Students highlight rewarding academic and personal development, practical work experience, and an international environment. There is no negative feedback recorded.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting academics, affordability, and the enriching city experience. Approximately 14% of feedback is negative, citing disorganization and administrative issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
The academic content of the master has been very interesting to me and I think I have learned a lot. Coordination I think it can improve since in the subjects taught by more than one teacher I have identified a lack of coherence. In relation to the practices, several problems have arisen since, when working with the juvenile protection or penal system, on several occasions it has taken more than the appropriate period to accept the practices. Also the list of centers that were offered last year, at which point I had to choose, this year they were not offered. However, the content of the master seems very good to me.
Nothing to show
