Erasmus University Rotterdam - EUR vs Maastricht University - UM vs Utrecht University - UU vs Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences vs NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 387 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse, international student community and networking opportunities
- +High-quality, experienced, and industry-connected teaching staff
- +Well-structured, rigorous, and practical academic programs
- +Supportive faculty and engaging teaching methods
- +International atmosphere and diverse student body
- +Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and small-group work
- +High quality education and independent thinking encouragement
- +Broad course selection and academic freedom
- +Insightful and practical courses useful for future careers
- +Engaging, hands-on learning connected to real careers.
- +Supportive, diverse community and international connections.
- +Vibrant campus life and modern facilities.
- +Welcoming atmosphere and helpful staff
- +Practical, project-based learning (DBE)
- +Opportunities for real-world experience and international exposure
Nothing to show
- +Practical and future-focused programmes addressing real-world issues.
- +Supportive, close-knit community with personalized attention.
- +International environment fostering diverse perspectives.
- -Excessive self-study required in courses.
- -General lack of course quality and unmet expectations.
- -Problem-based learning is seen as ineffective and overly demanding.
- -Strict academic policies, including high failure rates and BSA, create undue pressure.
- -Program organization and structure are often perceived as poor.
- -Administrative and communication issues are a major concern.
- -Lack of teacher and supervisor support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -The environment is perceived as stressful and lacking in positive support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and ineffective curriculum are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of teacher support are major issues.
- -Disorganization and unclear assessments lead to student confusion.
- -Inconsistent feedback and arbitrary grading practices are frustrating.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks practical application and real-world relevance.
Demonstrating commendable strengths, this institution excels in Internationality, boasting a score of 4.57. Other well-regarded areas include Location (4.42), Facilities (4.38), and Student Life (4.35), all reflecting positive student experiences. Notably, Accomodation received the lowest rating at 3.36, indicating a potential area for improvement. Professors and Value also received solid scores above 4.3.
This university garners excellent marks for its internationality, receiving a high rating of 4.54. Professors and value are also strong points, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and facilities are well-regarded, with ratings around 4.0 and 4.2 respectively. The location is rated adequately at 3.9. Notably, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 2.9.
Student feedback reveals a generally strong university experience. Location and Student Life stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both exceeding 4.25. Internationality and Value also received excellent scores, around 4.2. Facilities and Professors are rated well, though slightly lower than the top areas. Accomodation is the weakest point, scoring significantly lower than other categories.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in **Location** and **Facilities**, both receiving ratings above 4.2. **Student Life** and **Value** also score well, indicating a positive student experience and perceived return on investment. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** emerge as areas with the lowest scores, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects of university life. The average rating across all categories remains solid.
This institution garners exceptional ratings in **Facilities** (4.41) and **Internationality** (4.46), indicating a robust and globally connected campus environment. Student life also scores well at 4.07. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.62) and **Professors** (3.81) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, achieving perfect scores in both **Professors** and **Internationality**. It also scores highly in **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Accomodation** is a solid performer at 4. While no areas received low scores, **Accomodation** represents the slightly weaker point in an otherwise impressive evaluation.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~99%), with students praising its multicultural environment, diverse course offerings, and high-quality teaching staff. A small amount of negative feedback notes room for improvement in course structure and self-study components.
Approximately 91.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming campus, supportive professors, and a lively student city. Negative feedback, representing ~8.5%, points to high failing rates and concerns about the organization and pressure of Problem-Based Learning.
Approximately 98.3% of feedback is positive, highlighting high-quality education, independent thinking, and freedom in course selection. A small portion of feedback mentions disorganization and lack of guidance.
Around ~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive community and modern, hands-on learning connected to real-world careers. There are no negative reviews to summarize.
Around ~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere and practical, project-based learning. A smaller portion (~6.4%) of feedback criticizes poor organization, unclear assignments, and a lack of teacher availability or feedback.
Nothing to show
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight the Master River Delta Development course's real-world focus and practical impact, along with HZ University's supportive community and hands-on learning.
The campus is quite large, but not too large. The staff and students are very international, I feel like the education is at a very high level and it's an enjoyable place to be with many of the buildings being modern with a lot of light. I'm in a smaller class with 30 persons and I think it really is a great University to do a Master's at.
One of the most advertised features of the university, it is very pressuring and does not deliver the promised results - everything still has to be learned in the same manner as everywhere else - but here no tutorials are to be missed and PBL is supposed to be a key to successful graduation. Doing twice the work, therefore dividing the attention and time resources, without other options for students struggling with this method - then you are on your own.
Utrecht University strikes the ideal balance between top-tier academics and an amazing student experience. As a science major, I love how challenging and research-focused the program is—it really pushes me to think deeper. The Utrecht Science Park campus is super modern, sustainable, and just a great place to study. What really makes UU special is its international vibe. Working with classmates from all over the world brought fresh perspectives to every project. The libraries are fantastic (I lived in both the silent study zones and the lively café areas!), and a cool bonus is the free Dutch classes for international students—they seriously helped me feel at home. Utrecht itself is the perfect student city: historic canals, fun events, and just the right mix of energy and coziness. Sure, there’s some paperwork headaches sometimes, but overall, UU gave me everything I needed to grow—both academically and as a global citizen.
Nothing to show
Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
