Queen Mary University of London - QMUL vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs Birkbeck University of London vs St George's University of London vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 394 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive staff.
- +Excellent location with easy transport and surrounding amenities.
- +Positive environment, good social life, and valuable career support.
- +Supportive and caring staff communication
- +Engaging and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse and motivated student community
- +Strong healthcare focus and practical NHS experience
- +Excellent faculty support and expertise
- +Unique communication skills training and supportive community
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
- +Abundant opportunities for involvement and engagement.
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
- -Poor quality of teaching and academic standards.
- -Unfulfilled promises regarding education and career preparation.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student learning.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for students.
- -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often outdated and in poor condition.
- -Lack of communication and unclear policies cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff, are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered, leading to disengagement.
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
Overall, the university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in its Facilities and Internationality, both scoring above 4.3. Professors also received a commendable rating. Areas for potential improvement lie in Accomodation, which received the lowest score of the surveyed categories. Student Life and Location are rated moderately, with Value also falling within a similar range.
Academic and faculty excellence stand out, with professors receiving a near-perfect score. Location also scores highly, reflecting a desirable setting. However, student life and value represent the areas with the most room for improvement. Facilities and internationality are rated favorably, contributing to a generally positive assessment.
Overall, the university receives positive feedback. Its strongest areas include professors and value, both scoring very high. Student life and internationality also received strong marks. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which garnered the lowest score. Facilities and location fall in the mid-range, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas. It excels in its **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all receiving perfect marks. **Professors** and **Internationality** are also strong, earning a solid 4 out of 5. The university's **Value** is also rated a respectable 4, indicating good return on investment. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, particularly in its campus environment and amenities.
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 104 reviews, ~92% of students are positive. Recurring themes praise knowledgeable staff, good course content, ideal city-centre locations, and employability support. A small ~2% expressed dissatisfaction with teaching quality and course focus.
With a 4.26/5 average rating from 35 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong communication, caring and approachable staff, and knowledgeable, engaging lecturers. Small class sizes foster personalized attention.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise healthcare courses, practical experience, faculty support, and the university's location. Some minor concerns include slow administration.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The sole reviewer highlighted abundant opportunities, including study abroad and co-op programs, and engaging communities. No negative feedback was recorded.
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
My time at City University London was truly transformative. The university's vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities allowed me to forge lifelong friendships and professional connections that extend beyond the classroom. I was impressed by the university's commitment to academic rigor, character development, and personal growth, which created an ideal environment for me to reach my full potential. The research-driven and industry-relevant curriculum provided me with a solid foundation in international business, while the dedicated faculty and staff offered invaluable guidance and support. I feel grateful for the well-rounded education and holistic experience that City University London offered, preparing me for success in my career and beyond.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
